@inproceedings{shen-etal-2017-empirical,
title = "An Empirical Analysis of Multiple-Turn Reasoning Strategies in Reading Comprehension Tasks",
author = "Shen, Yelong and
Liu, Xiaodong and
Duh, Kevin and
Gao, Jianfeng",
editor = "Kondrak, Greg and
Watanabe, Taro",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = nov,
year = "2017",
address = "Taipei, Taiwan",
publisher = "Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/I17-1096/",
pages = "957--966",
abstract = "Reading comprehension (RC) is a challenging task that requires synthesis of information across sentences and multiple turns of reasoning. Using a state-of-the-art RC model, we empirically investigate the performance of single-turn and multiple-turn reasoning on the SQuAD and MS MARCO datasets. The RC model is an end-to-end neural network with iterative attention, and uses reinforcement learning to dynamically control the number of turns. We find that multiple-turn reasoning outperforms single-turn reasoning for all question and answer types; further, we observe that enabling a flexible number of turns generally improves upon a fixed multiple-turn strategy. {\%}across all question types, and is particularly beneficial to questions with lengthy, descriptive answers. We achieve results competitive to the state-of-the-art on these two datasets."
}
Markdown (Informal)
[An Empirical Analysis of Multiple-Turn Reasoning Strategies in Reading Comprehension Tasks](https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/I17-1096/) (Shen et al., IJCNLP 2017)
ACL