@inproceedings{wachsmuth-etal-2017-pagerank,
    title = "{\textquotedblleft}{P}age{R}ank{\textquotedblright} for Argument Relevance",
    author = "Wachsmuth, Henning  and
      Stein, Benno  and
      Ajjour, Yamen",
    editor = "Lapata, Mirella  and
      Blunsom, Phil  and
      Koller, Alexander",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the {E}uropean Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers",
    month = apr,
    year = "2017",
    address = "Valencia, Spain",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/E17-1105/",
    pages = "1117--1127",
    abstract = "Future search engines are expected to deliver pro and con arguments in response to queries on controversial topics. While argument mining is now in the focus of research, the question of how to retrieve the relevant arguments remains open. This paper proposes a radical model to assess relevance objectively at web scale: the relevance of an argument`s conclusion is decided by what other arguments reuse it as a premise. We build an argument graph for this model that we analyze with a recursive weighting scheme, adapting key ideas of PageRank. In experiments on a large ground-truth argument graph, the resulting relevance scores correlate with human average judgments. We outline what natural language challenges must be faced at web scale in order to stepwise bring argument relevance to web search engines."
}