@inproceedings{jiang-etal-2024-peek,
    title = "A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasoners",
    author = "Jiang, Bowen  and
      Xie, Yangxinyu  and
      Hao, Zhuoqun  and
      Wang, Xiaomeng  and
      Mallick, Tanwi  and
      Su, Weijie J  and
      Taylor, Camillo Jose  and
      Roth, Dan",
    editor = "Al-Onaizan, Yaser  and
      Bansal, Mohit  and
      Chen, Yun-Nung",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
    month = nov,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Miami, Florida, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/2024.emnlp-main.272/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.272",
    pages = "4722--4756",
    abstract = "This study introduces a hypothesis-testing framework to assess whether large language models (LLMs) possess genuine reasoning abilities or primarily depend on token bias. We go beyond evaluating LLMs on accuracy; rather, we aim to investigate their token bias in solving logical reasoning tasks. Specifically, we develop carefully controlled synthetic datasets, featuring conjunction fallacy and syllogistic problems. Our framework outlines a list of hypotheses where token biases are readily identifiable, with all null hypotheses assuming genuine reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The findings in this study suggest, with statistical guarantee, that most LLMs still struggle with logical reasoning. While they may perform well on classic problems, their success largely depends on recognizing superficial patterns with strong token bias, thereby raising concerns about their actual reasoning and generalization abilities."
}