@inproceedings{javorsky-etal-2022-continuous,
    title = "Continuous Rating as Reliable Human Evaluation of Simultaneous Speech Translation",
    author = "Javorsk{\'y}, D{\'a}vid  and
      Mach{\'a}{\v{c}}ek, Dominik  and
      Bojar, Ond{\v{r}}ej",
    editor = {Koehn, Philipp  and
      Barrault, Lo{\"i}c  and
      Bojar, Ond{\v{r}}ej  and
      Bougares, Fethi  and
      Chatterjee, Rajen  and
      Costa-juss{\`a}, Marta R.  and
      Federmann, Christian  and
      Fishel, Mark  and
      Fraser, Alexander  and
      Freitag, Markus  and
      Graham, Yvette  and
      Grundkiewicz, Roman  and
      Guzman, Paco  and
      Haddow, Barry  and
      Huck, Matthias  and
      Jimeno Yepes, Antonio  and
      Kocmi, Tom  and
      Martins, Andr{\'e}  and
      Morishita, Makoto  and
      Monz, Christof  and
      Nagata, Masaaki  and
      Nakazawa, Toshiaki  and
      Negri, Matteo  and
      N{\'e}v{\'e}ol, Aur{\'e}lie  and
      Neves, Mariana  and
      Popel, Martin  and
      Turchi, Marco  and
      Zampieri, Marcos},
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Machine Translation (WMT)",
    month = dec,
    year = "2022",
    address = "Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Hybrid)",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/2022.wmt-1.9/",
    pages = "154--164",
    abstract = "Simultaneous speech translation (SST) can be evaluated on simulated online events where human evaluators watch subtitled videos and continuously express their satisfaction by pressing buttons (so called Continuous Rating). Continuous Rating is easy to collect, but little is known about its reliability, or relation to comprehension of foreign language document by SST users. In this paper, we contrast Continuous Rating with factual questionnaires on judges with different levels of source language knowledge. Our results show that Continuous Rating is easy and reliable SST quality assessment if the judges have at least limited knowledge of the source language. Our study indicates users' preferences on subtitle layout and presentation style and, most importantly, provides a significant evidence that users with advanced source language knowledge prefer low latency over fewer re-translations."
}