@inproceedings{longpre-etal-2020-effective,
title = "How Effective is Task-Agnostic Data Augmentation for Pretrained Transformers?",
author = "Longpre, Shayne and
Wang, Yu and
DuBois, Chris",
editor = "Cohn, Trevor and
He, Yulan and
Liu, Yang",
booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020",
month = nov,
year = "2020",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/2020.findings-emnlp.394/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.394",
pages = "4401--4411",
abstract = "Task-agnostic forms of data augmentation have proven widely effective in computer vision, even on pretrained models. In NLP similar results are reported most commonly for low data regimes, non-pretrained models, or situationally for pretrained models. In this paper we ask how effective these techniques really are when applied to pretrained transformers. Using two popular varieties of task-agnostic data augmentation (not tailored to any particular task), Easy Data Augmentation (Wei andZou, 2019) and Back-Translation (Sennrichet al., 2015), we conduct a systematic examination of their effects across 5 classification tasks, 6 datasets, and 3 variants of modern pretrained transformers, including BERT, XLNet, and RoBERTa. We observe a negative result, finding that techniques which previously reported strong improvements for non-pretrained models fail to consistently improve performance for pretrained transformers, even when training data is limited. We hope this empirical analysis helps inform practitioners where data augmentation techniques may confer improvements."
}
Markdown (Informal)
[How Effective is Task-Agnostic Data Augmentation for Pretrained Transformers?](https://preview.aclanthology.org/jlcl-multiple-ingestion/2020.findings-emnlp.394/) (Longpre et al., Findings 2020)
ACL