@inproceedings{johnson-etal-2017-ideological,
    title = "Ideological Phrase Indicators for Classification of Political Discourse Framing on {T}witter",
    author = "Johnson, Kristen  and
      Lee, I-Ta  and
      Goldwasser, Dan",
    editor = {Hovy, Dirk  and
      Volkova, Svitlana  and
      Bamman, David  and
      Jurgens, David  and
      O{'}Connor, Brendan  and
      Tsur, Oren  and
      Do{\u{g}}ru{\"o}z, A. Seza},
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second Workshop on {NLP} and Computational Social Science",
    month = aug,
    year = "2017",
    address = "Vancouver, Canada",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/iwcs-25-ingestion/W17-2913/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/W17-2913",
    pages = "90--99",
    abstract = "Politicians carefully word their statements in order to influence how others view an issue, a political strategy called framing. Simultaneously, these frames may also reveal the beliefs or positions on an issue of the politician. Simple language features such as unigrams, bigrams, and trigrams are important indicators for identifying the general frame of a text, for both longer congressional speeches and shorter tweets of politicians. However, tweets may contain multiple unigrams across different frames which limits the effectiveness of this approach. In this paper, we present a joint model which uses both linguistic features of tweets and ideological phrase indicators extracted from a state-of-the-art embedding-based model to predict the general frame of political tweets."
}