Hope and Fear: How Opinions Influence Factuality

Chantal van Son, Marieke van Erp, Antske Fokkens, Piek Vossen


Abstract
Both sentiment and event factuality are fundamental information levels for our understanding of events mentioned in news texts. Most research so far has focused on either modeling opinions or factuality. In this paper, we propose a model that combines the two for the extraction and interpretation of perspectives on events. By doing so, we can explain the way people perceive changes in (their belief of) the world as a function of their fears of changes to the bad or their hopes of changes to the good. This study seeks to examine the effectiveness of this approach by applying factuality annotations, based on FactBank, on top of the MPQA Corpus, a corpus containing news texts annotated for sentiments and other private states. Our findings suggest that this approach can be valuable for the understanding of perspectives, but that there is still some work to do on the refinement of the integration.
Anthology ID:
L14-1194
Volume:
Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'14)
Month:
May
Year:
2014
Address:
Reykjavik, Iceland
Venue:
LREC
SIG:
Publisher:
European Language Resources Association (ELRA)
Note:
Pages:
3857–3864
Language:
URL:
http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/188_Paper.pdf
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Chantal van Son, Marieke van Erp, Antske Fokkens, and Piek Vossen. 2014. Hope and Fear: How Opinions Influence Factuality. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'14), pages 3857–3864, Reykjavik, Iceland. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
Cite (Informal):
Hope and Fear: How Opinions Influence Factuality (van Son et al., LREC 2014)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/188_Paper.pdf