Existing text revision systems are capable of generating fluent and coherent text, but struggle with constrained text revision (CTR), which requires adherence to specific constraints. Furthermore, adapting these systems to diverse constraints is challenging. To bridge this gap, we introduce TRIPS, a Text Revision agent via Iterative Planning and Searching, focusing on CTR. TRIPS utilizes a planner, a reviser (i.e., a large language model), and adaptable tools to generate revisions tailored to different scenarios. Specifically, we propose an iterative self-training alignment method to construct the planner, which generates tool usage and text revision plans. Furthermore, we propose Tool-Guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (TG-MCTS), a novel CTR algorithm that extends MCTS with tool-guided expansion and evaluation, enabling the search for optimal revision strategies across various scenarios. To evaluate TRIPS, we introduce ConsTRev, a dataset with multi-level constrained instructions for paragraph-level revision. Experimental results show that TRIPS outperforms baselines in both constraint adherence and revision quality. Furthermore, TRIPS exhibits robust performance across diverse use cases, including plain text and LaTeX revision.

A Writing Assistant (WA) is a system that offers writing suggestions based on user instructions. Existing WAs are typically built by training large language models (LLMs) on domain-specific instruction data through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) only. However, SFT optimizes models to match a single reference, failing to capture the inherent flexibility of text editing, where multiple valid revisions exist. Therefore, solely relying on SFT limits WA performance. To address this limitation, we propose the Rationalize and Align framework, which enhances the WA performance with rationale (i.e., linguistic explanations) and alignment. Our framework automatically generates the rationale and preference data for writing tasks via distillation and self-training, eliminating the need for human annotation. These data are then leveraged to refine WA using a novel preference optimization method. Empirical results show that our framework significantly improves WA performance. Our WA outperforms both open-source state-of-the-art WAs and the closed-source GPT-4o by 3.9 and 7.1 points on average, respectively, across eight well-established writing-related test sets.

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is the task of automatically detecting and correcting errors in text. The task not only includes the correction of grammatical errors, such as missing prepositions and mismatched subject–verb agreement, but also orthographic and semantic errors, such as misspellings and word choice errors, respectively. The field has seen significant progress in the last decade, motivated in part by a series of five shared tasks, which drove the development of rule-based methods, statistical classifiers, statistical machine translation, and finally neural machine translation systems, which represent the current dominant state of the art. In this survey paper, we condense the field into a single article and first outline some of the linguistic challenges of the task, introduce the most popular datasets that are available to researchers (for both English and other languages), and summarize the various methods and techniques that have been developed with a particular focus on artificial error generation. We next describe the many different approaches to evaluation as well as concerns surrounding metric reliability, especially in relation to subjective human judgments, before concluding with an overview of recent progress and suggestions for future work and remaining challenges. We hope that this survey will serve as a comprehensive resource for researchers who are new to the field or who want to be kept apprised of recent developments.

The most popular approach in grammatical error correction (GEC) is based on sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models. Similar to other autoregressive generation tasks, seq2seq GEC also faces the exposure bias problem, i.e., the context tokens are drawn from different distributions during training and testing, caused by the teacher forcing mechanism. In this paper, we propose a novel data manipulation approach to overcome this problem, which includes a data augmentation method during training to mimic the decoder input at inference time, and a data reweighting method to automatically balance the importance of each kind of augmented samples. Experimental results on benchmark GEC datasets show that our method achieves significant improvements compared to prior approaches.

State-of-the-art grammatical error correction (GEC) systems rely on parallel training data (ungrammatical sentences and their manually corrected counterparts), which are expensive to construct. In this paper, we employ the Break-It-Fix-It (BIFI) method to build an unsupervised GEC system. The BIFI framework generates parallel data from unlabeled text using a fixer to transform ungrammatical sentences into grammatical ones, and a critic to predict sentence grammaticality. We present an unsupervised approach to build the fixer and the critic, and an algorithm that allows them to iteratively improve each other. We evaluate our unsupervised GEC system on English and Chinese GEC. Empirical results show that our GEC system outperforms previous unsupervised GEC systems, and achieves performance comparable to supervised GEC systems without ensemble. Furthermore, when combined with labeled training data, our system achieves new state-of-the-art results on the CoNLL-2014 and NLPCC-2018 test sets.

Although grammatical error correction (GEC) has achieved good performance on texts written by learners of English as a second language, performance on low error density domains where texts are written by English speakers of varying levels of proficiency can still be improved. In this paper, we propose a contrastive learning approach to encourage the GEC model to assign a higher probability to a correct sentence while reducing the probability of incorrect sentences that the model tends to generate, so as to improve the accuracy of the model. Experimental results show that our approach significantly improves the performance of GEC models in low error density domains, when evaluated on the benchmark CWEB dataset.