In named entity recognition (NER), models are evaluated on their ability to identify entity mentions in text. However, standard evaluation methods often rely on test sets that contain named entities already present in the training data, raising concerns about overestimation of model performance.This work investigates the impact of varying degrees of entity contamination on a dataset level on the generalization ability and reported F1 scores of three state-of-the-art NER models.Experiments on five standard benchmarks show that F1 scores for contaminated entities statistically significantly inflate reported F1 scores as contamination rates increase, with F1 performance gaps ranging from 2-10% compared to entities not seen during training.To address these inflated F1 scores, we additionally propose a novel NER dataset splitting method using a minimum cut algorithm to minimize train-test entity leakage.While our splitting method ensures near-zero entity contamination, we also compare new and existing dataset splits on named entity sample counts.

When extracting structured information from text, recognizing entities and extracting relationships are essential. Recent advances in both tasks generate a structured representation of the information in an autoregressive manner, a time-consuming and computationally expensive approach. This naturally raises the question of whether autoregressive methods are necessary in order to achieve comparable results. In this work, we propose ITER, an efficient encoder-based relation extraction model, that performs the task in three parallelizable steps, greatly accelerating a recent language modeling approach: ITER achieves an inference throughput of over 600 samples per second for a large model on a single consumer-grade GPU. Furthermore, we achieve state-of-the-art results on the relation extraction datasets ADE and ACE05, and demonstrate competitive performance for both named entity recognition with GENIA and CoNLL03, and for relation extraction with SciERC and CoNLL04.