The rapid expansion of Large Language Models (LLMs) and natural language processing datasets has made exhaustive benchmark evaluations computationally prohibitive. Inspired by high-stakes competitions like the International Mathematical Olympiad-where a few well-chosen problems suffice to differentiate top performers—we present SubLIME, which reduces evaluation costs by 80% to 99% while preserving ranking fidelity. It trains a Rank Correlation Prediction (RCP) model that combines limited performance data from only 5-20 anchor LLMs with dataset intrinsic metrics - Difficulty, Quality, and Distributional Dispersion-to predict how closely a candidate subset reflects full-benchmark rankings. Guided by these predictions, SubLIME selects a “winning” subset (1-20% of full set data) for evaluating new LLMs, preserving global rankings significant better than other data-efficient methods across ten diverse benchmarks.

Weight tying is now a common setting in many language generation tasks such as language modeling and machine translation. However, a recent study reveals that there is a potential flaw in weight tying. They find that the learned word embeddings are likely to degenerate and lie in a narrow cone when training a language model. They call it the representation degeneration problem and propose a cosine regularization to solve it. Nevertheless, we prove that the cosine regularization is insufficient to solve the problem, as the degeneration is still likely to happen under certain conditions. In this paper, we revisit the representation degeneration problem and theoretically analyze the limitations of the previously proposed solution. Afterward, we propose an alternative regularization method called Laplacian regularization to tackle the problem. Experiments on language modeling demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed Laplacian regularization.