Wait, that’s not an option: LLMs Robustness with Incorrect Multiple-Choice Options
Gracjan Góral, Emilia Wiśnios, Piotr Sankowski, Paweł Budzianowski
Abstract
This work introduces a novel framework for evaluating LLMs’ capacity to balance instruction-following with critical reasoning when presented with multiple-choice questions containing no valid answers. Through systematic evaluation across arithmetic, domain-specific knowledge, and high-stakes medical decision tasks, we demonstrate that post-training aligned models often default to selecting invalid options, while base models exhibit improved refusal capabilities that scale with model size. Our analysis reveals that alignment techniques, though intended to enhance helpfulness, can inadvertently impair models’ reflective judgment–the ability to override default behaviors when faced with invalid options. We additionally conduct a parallel human study showing similar instruction-following biases, with implications for how these biases may propagate through human feedback datasets used in alignment. We provide extensive ablation studies examining the impact of model size, training techniques, and prompt engineering. Our findings highlight fundamental tensions between alignment optimization and preservation of critical reasoning capabilities, with important implications for developing more robust AI systems for real-world deployment.- Anthology ID:
- 2025.acl-long.75
- Volume:
- Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
- Month:
- July
- Year:
- 2025
- Address:
- Vienna, Austria
- Editors:
- Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar
- Venue:
- ACL
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- Association for Computational Linguistics
- Note:
- Pages:
- 1495–1515
- Language:
- URL:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingestion-acl-25/2025.acl-long.75/
- DOI:
- Cite (ACL):
- Gracjan Góral, Emilia Wiśnios, Piotr Sankowski, and Paweł Budzianowski. 2025. Wait, that’s not an option: LLMs Robustness with Incorrect Multiple-Choice Options. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1495–1515, Vienna, Austria. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Cite (Informal):
- Wait, that’s not an option: LLMs Robustness with Incorrect Multiple-Choice Options (Góral et al., ACL 2025)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingestion-acl-25/2025.acl-long.75.pdf