@inproceedings{tang-etal-2025-l,
    title = "$\textit{L-CiteEval}$: A Suite for Evaluating Fidelity of Long-context Models",
    author = "Tang, Zecheng  and
      Zhou, Keyan  and
      Li, Juntao  and
      Ji, Baibei  and
      Hou, Jianye  and
      Zhang, Min",
    editor = "Che, Wanxiang  and
      Nabende, Joyce  and
      Shutova, Ekaterina  and
      Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Vienna, Austria",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingestion-acl-25/2025.acl-long.263/",
    pages = "5254--5277",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-251-0",
    abstract = "Long-context models(LCMs) have witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, facilitating real-world tasks like long-document QA. The success of LCMs is founded on the hypothesis that the model demonstrates strong $\textbf{fidelity}$, enabling it to respond based on the provided long context rather than relying solely on the intrinsic knowledge acquired during pre-training. Yet, in this paper, we find that open-sourced LCMs are not as faithful as expected. We introduce $\textit{L-CiteEval}$, an out-of-the-box suite that can assess both generation quality and fidelity in long-context understanding tasks. It covers 11 tasks with context lengths ranging from 8K to 48K and a corresponding automatic evaluation pipeline. Evaluation of 11 cutting-edge closed-source and open-source LCMs indicates that, while there are minor differences in their generation, open-source models significantly lag behind closed-source counterparts in terms of fidelity. Furthermore, we analyze the benefits of citation generation for LCMs from both the perspective of explicit model output and the internal attention mechanism."
}