Automated Claim Verification (CV)—the task of assessing a claim’s veracity against explicitly provided evidence—is a critical tool in the fight against growing misinformation. This survey offers a comprehensive analysis of 198 studies published between January 2022 and March 2025, synthesizing recent advances in CV corpus creation and system design. Through two in-depth case studies, we illuminate persistent challenges in veracity annotation, limitations of conventional CV pipelines, and pitfalls in recent claim decomposition approaches. We conclude by identifying key unresolved challenges and proposing productive directions for future research.

Biomedical articles are often inaccessible to non-experts due to their technical complexity. To improve readability and factuality of lay summaries, we built on an extract-then-summarize framework by experimenting with novel extractive summarization strategies and employing Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning of Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct on data selected by these strategies. We also explored counterfactual data augmentation and post-processing definition insertion to further enhance factual grounding and accessibility. Our best performing system treats the article’s title and keywords (i.e. search terms) as a single semantic centroid and ranks sentences by their semantic similarity to this centroid. This constrained selection of data serves as input for fine-tuning, achieving marked improvements in readability and factuality of downstream abstractive summaries while maintaining relevance. Our approach highlights the importance of quality data curation for biomedicallay summarization, resulting in 4th best overall performance and 2nd best Readability performance for the BioLaySumm 2025 Shared Task at BioNLP 2025.