You are given one sample with Step1/Step2/Step3 traces and the final decided labels.
Write ONE concise reasoning paragraph that JUSTIFIES the final labels.

Hard constraints:
1) Output ONLY:
<analysis>...</analysis>

2) The reasoning MUST be consistent with:
final_task2={final_task2}
final_task1={final_task1}
You MUST NOT say the final label is wrong, misleading, or should be another label.

3) Do NOT mention the pipeline, steps, traces, "the model", "guidelines",
   "few-shot", or any external reminders.
   Do NOT mention "Step1/Step2/Step3", "decided_step", or "OTHER".

4) If step1_label is OTHER, treat it as:
   "non-non-reply labels (Explicit/Implicit/Partial/General/Deflection/Dodging)".
   (But do NOT mention this mapping in the output.)

5) Keep it concise: 2-6 sentences total.
   At least one sentence must point to specific content from the interview_answer
   (quote a short phrase or clearly paraphrase a concrete part).

6) Optional: you may include ONE brief contrast with a nearby label
   (e.g., "This is X rather than Y because ..."),
   but it must still support the final_task2.
