% \begin{table}[t]
%     \centering
%     \begin{tabular}{@{}llr@{}}
%\toprule
%\multicolumn{2}{l}{total \# stories} & 1630 \\\midrule
%\multirow{2}{*}{setup} & in full & 792 \\
% & in chunks & 838 \\ \midrule
%\multirow{5}{*}{story type} & dog story      &        750 \\
% & jail story     &        386 \\
% & park story     &        326 \\
% & marathon story &        155 \\
% & snow story     &13 \\ \midrule
%  &  \\\bottomrule
%     \end{tabular}
%     \caption{Overall statistics in \datasetname}
%     \label{tab:data-stats}
% \end{table}

\newcommand{\sigg}{$^{**}$}
\newcommand{\sig}{$^{*}$}
\begin{table}[t]
    \centering
    \small
    \begin{tabular}{@{}l@{\hspace{.2em}}lc|rc@{}l@{}}
        \toprule
        & & \multirow{2}{*}{total} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{written in...} & \\
        & & & \textit{full} & \textit{seq.} & \\ \midrule
        \multirow{4}{*}{\rotatebox{90}{stats}} &\# stories & 1630 & 792 & 838 &\\
        & avg. \# toks & 592 & 583 & 600 \\
        & avg. writing time (min)  & 9.30 & 9.98 & 8.72 & \\
        & avg. key press time (sec) & 0.96 & 1.09 & 0.83 \\ 
        \midrule
        \multirow{6}{*}{\rotatebox{90}{ratings}}
        & coherent     &  4.52 &   4.78 &  4.27 & \sigg \\
        & confusing    &  3.44 &   3.19 &  3.67 & \sigg  \\
        & creative     &  4.00 &   4.09 &  3.90 & \sig\\
        & entertaining &  3.95 &   4.10 &  3.81 & \sigg  \\
        & grammatical  &  4.22 &   4.39 &  4.06 & \sigg  \\
        & liked        &  3.89 &   4.05 &  3.73 & \sigg  \\
        \bottomrule
    \end{tabular}
    \caption{Statistics in \datasetname for all stories, as well as broken down by writing setup (\textit{full}: written in full, \textit{seq.}: written sequentially).
    Discussed in \S\ref{sec:writing-setup-analyses}, rating differences are significant after Holm-correcting for multiple comparisons (\sig: p$<$0.01, \sigg: p$<$0.001), but story length (\# toks), writing time, and writing speed (key press time) are not.
    }
    \label{tab:data-stats}
\end{table}

