What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?

Amelie Wuehrl


Abstract
While automatic fact verification has grown into an established research field in the last years, work on the follow-up step, i.e., conveying fact checking results to users, is still lacking. Presumably, this is because it requires a multidisciplinary approach, as NLP methods to generate such result briefs with a meaningful impact may depend on the consideration of complex psychological processes. In this extended abstract, we discuss the setting and the tasks, questions and considerations connected to it.
Anthology ID:
2025.nlpsi-1.9
Volume:
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ’25
Month:
June
Year:
2025
Address:
Copenhagen, Denmark
Editors:
Aswathy Velutharambath, Sofie Labat, Neele Falk, Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, Roman Klinger, Véronique Hoste
Venues:
NLPSI | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)
Note:
Pages:
90–91
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-nlpsi/2025.nlpsi-1.9/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Amelie Wuehrl. 2025. What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ’25, pages 90–91, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org).
Cite (Informal):
What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results? (Wuehrl, NLPSI 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-nlpsi/2025.nlpsi-1.9.pdf