@inproceedings{zuo-etal-2025-evaluating,
    title = "Evaluating Large Language Models for Cross-Lingual Retrieval",
    author = "Zuo, Longfei  and
      Hong, Pingjun  and
      Kraus, Oliver  and
      Plank, Barbara  and
      Litschko, Robert",
    editor = "Christodoulopoulos, Christos  and
      Chakraborty, Tanmoy  and
      Rose, Carolyn  and
      Peng, Violet",
    booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025",
    month = nov,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Suzhou, China",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-luhme/2025.findings-emnlp.612/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.612",
    pages = "11415--11429",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-335-7",
    abstract = "Multi-stage information retrieval (IR) has become a widely-adopted paradigm in search. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively evaluated as second-stage reranking models for monolingual IR, a systematic large-scale comparison is still lacking for cross-lingual IR (CLIR). Moreover, while prior work shows that LLM-based rerankers improve CLIR performance, their evaluation setup relies on machine translation (MT) for the first stage. This is not only prohibitively expensive but also prone to error propagation across stages. Our evaluation on passage-level and document-level CLIR reveals that this setup, which we term \textit{noisy monolingual IR}, is favorable for LLMs. However, LLMs still fail to improve the first-stage ranking if instead produced by multilingual bi-encoders. We further show that pairwise rerankers based on instruction-tuned LLMs perform competitively with listwise rerankers. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study the interaction between retrievers and rerankers in two-stage CLIR with LLMs. Our findings reveal that, without MT, current state-of-the-art rerankers fall severely short when directly applied in CLIR."
}