Despite major advances in machine translation (MT) in recent years, progress remains limited for many low-resource languages that lack large-scale training data and linguistic resources. In this paper, we introduce SINITICMTERROR, a novel fine-grained dataset that builds on existing parallel corpora to provide error span, error type, and error severity annotations in machine-translated examples from English to Mandarin, Cantonese, and Wu Chinese, along with a Mandarin-Hokkien component derived from a non-parallel source. Our dataset serves as a resource for the MT community to fine-tune models with error detection capabilities, supporting research on translation quality estimation, error-aware generation, and low-resource language evaluation. We also establish baseline results using language models to benchmark translation error detection performance. Specifically, we evaluate multiple open source and closed source LLMs using span-level and correlation-based MQM metrics, revealing their limited precision, underscoring the need for our dataset. Finally, we report our rigorous annotation process by native speakers, with analyses on pilot studies, iterative feedback, insights, and patterns in error type and severity.

The URIEL+ linguistic knowledge base supports multilingual research by encoding languages through geographic, genetic, and typological vectors. However, data sparsity (e.g. missing feature types, incomplete language entries, and limited genealogical coverage) remains prevalent. This limits the usefulness of URIEL+ in cross-lingual transfer, particularly for supporting low-resource languages. To address this sparsity, we extend URIEL+ by introducing script vectors to represent writing system properties for 7,488 languages, integrating Glottolog to add 18,710 additional languages, and expanding lineage imputation for 26,449 languages by propagating typological and script features across genealogies. These improvements reduce feature sparsity by 14% for script vectors, increase language coverage by up to 19,015 languages (1,007%), and boost imputation quality metrics by up to 35%. Our benchmark on cross-lingual transfer tasks (oriented around low-resource languages) shows occasionally divergent performance compared to URIEL+, with performance gains up to 6% in certain setups.

Existing linguistic knowledge bases such as URIEL+ provide valuable geographic, genetic and typological distances for cross-lingual transfer but suffer from two key limitations. First, their one-size-fits-all vector representations are ill-suited to the diverse structures of linguistic data. Second, they lack a principled method for aggregating these signals into a single, comprehensive score. In this paper, we address these gaps by introducing a framework for type-matched language distances. We propose novel, structure-aware representations for each distance type: speaker-weighted distributions for geography, hyperbolic embeddings for genealogy, and a latent variables model for typology. We unify these signals into a robust, task-agnostic composite distance. Across multiple zero-shot transfer benchmarks, we demonstrate that our representations significantly improve transfer performance when the distance type is relevant to the task, while our composite distance yields gains in most tasks.

Linguistic feature datasets such as URIEL+ are valuable for modelling cross-lingual relationships, but their high dimensionality and sparsity, especially for low-resource languages, limit the effectiveness of distance metrics. We propose a pipeline to optimize the URIEL+ typological feature space by combining feature selection and imputation, producing compact yet interpretable typological representations. We evaluate these feature subsets on linguistic distance alignment and downstream tasks, demonstrating that reduced-size representations of language typology can yield more informative distance metrics and improve performance in multilingual NLP applications.