We present the MultiplEYE Text Corpus, a large-scale, document-level, multi-parallel resource designed to advance cross-linguistic research on reading and language processing. The corpus provides paragraph-level alignment for texts in 39 languages spanning seven language families and seven scripts. Unlike many existing multilingual corpora, a substantial number of documents were originally written in languages other than English, reducing English-centric bias and supporting more typologically diverse investigations. The texts are carefully selected to balance linguistic richness with experimental feasibility, particularly for eye-tracking-while-reading studies. Developed within a multi-lab initiative, the MultiplEYE Text Corpus follows unified translation, alignment, and experimental design guidelines to ensure cross-linguistic comparability. Its inclusion of texts varying in type and difficulty enables research on discourselevel processing, genre effects, and individual differences across a wide range of languages. The text corpus and accompanying metadata provide a robust foundation for multilingual psycholinguistic and computational modeling research. Data and materials are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21750.

This paper investigates good-enough parsing in Turkish by comparing human self-paced reading performance to the surprisal and attention patterns of three Turkish Large Language Models (LLMs), GPT-2-Base, GPT-2-Large, and LLaMA-3. The results show that Turkish speakers rely on good-enough parsing for implausible but grammatically permissible sentences (e.g., interpreting sentences such as ‘the man bit the dog’ as ‘the dog bit the man’). Although the smaller LLMs (e.g., GPT-2) were better predictors of human RTs, they seem to have relied more heavily on semantic plausibility than humans. Comparably, larger LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-3) tended to make more probabilistic parsing based on word order, exhibiting less good-enough parsing behavior. Therefore, we conclude that LLMs take syntactic and semantic constraints into account when processing thematic roles, but not to the same extent as human parsers.