Argumentation mining comprises several subtasks, among which stance classification focuses on identifying the standpoint expressed in an argumentative text toward a specific target topic. While arguments—especially about controversial topics—often appeal to emotions, most prior work has not systematically incorporated explicit, fine-grained emotion analysis to improve performance on this task. In particular, prior research on stance classification has predominantly utilized non-argumentative texts and has been restricted to specific domains or topics, limiting generalizability. We work on five datasets from diverse domains encompassing a range of controversial topics and present an approach for expanding the Bias-Corrected NRC Emotion Lexicon using DistilBERT embeddings, which we feed into a Neural Argumentative Stance Classification model. Our method systematically expands the emotion lexicon through contextualized embeddings to identify emotionally charged terms not previously captured in the lexicon. Our expanded NRC lexicon (eNRC) improves over the baseline across all five datasets (up to +6.2 percentage points in F1 score), outperforms the original NRC on four datasets (up to +3.0), and surpasses the LLM-based approach on nearly all corpora. We provide all resources—including eNRC, the adapted corpora, and model architecture—to enable other researchers to build upon our work

Argumentation mining (AM) is concerned with extracting arguments from texts and classifying the elements (e.g.,claim and premise) and relations between them, as well as creating an argumentative structure. A significant hurdle to research in this area for the Persian language is the lack of annotated Persian language corpora. This paper introduces the first argument-annotated corpus in Persian and thereby the possibility of expanding argumentation mining to this low-resource language. The starting point is the English argumentative microtext corpus (AMT) (Peldszus and Stede, 2015), and we built the Persian variant by machine translation (MT) and careful post-editing of the output. We call this corpus Persian argumentative microtext (PAMT). Moreover, we present the first results for Argumentative Discourse Unit (ADU) classification for Persian, which is considered to be one of the main fundamental subtasks of argumentation mining. We adopted span categorization using the deep learning model of spaCy Version 3.0 (a CNN model on top of Bloom embedding with attention) on the corpus for determing argumentative units and their type (claim vs. premise).