Character-authentic dialogue remains challenging for large language models (LLMs) due to limited character-specific data, generic-style collapse, and hallucinations regarding persona facts. Our work presents a comparative evaluation of several learning strategies for character dialogue grounded in question–answer (QA) data, comparing zero/few-shot prompting, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), direct preference optimization (DPO), and a hybrid approach that integrates retrieval-augmented character profiles and knowledge with policy optimization. Using both single-turn and multi-turn settings, we assess multiple dimensions central to character dialogue quality: reproducibility, diversity, hallucination, and character authenticity. Results show that SFT excels in reproducibility and hallucination reduction but tends to shorten and simplify outputs, thereby reducing diversity and authenticity. DPO improves stylistic fidelity and authenticity but depends strongly on externalized character knowledge to limit hallucinations. The hybrid variant that combines character-knowledge retrieval with DPO achieves the best overall balance, delivering strong authenticity while maintaining factual consistency and competitive reproducibility in both single- and multi-turn dialogues. We further analyze the model’s sensitivity to knowledge retrieval and response-length effects and discuss trade-offs among optimization targets that inform practical design choices for developing faithful and engaging character agents trained from scalable QA resources.

Facilitating self-disclosure without causing discomfort remains a difficult task—especially for AI systems. In real-world applications such as career counseling, wellbeing support, and onboarding interviews, eliciting personal information like concerns, goals, and personality traits is essential. However, asking such questions directly often leads to discomfort and disengagement. We address this issue with RaPSIL (Rapport-aware Preference-guided Self-disclosure Interview Learner), a two-stage LLM-based system that fosters natural, engaging conversations to promote self-disclosure. In the first stage, RaPSIL selectively imitates interviewer utterances that have been evaluated by LLMs for both strategic effectiveness and social sensitivity. It leverages LLMs as multi-perspective judges in this selection process. In the second stage, it conducts self-play simulations, using the Reflexion framework to analyze failures and expand a database with both successful and problematic utterances. This dual learning process allows RaPSIL to go beyond simple imitation, improving its ability to handle sensitive topics naturally by learning from both successful and failed utterances. In a comprehensive evaluation with real users, RaPSIL outperformed baselines in enjoyability, warmth, and willingness to re-engage, while also capturing self-descriptions more accurately. Notably, its impression scores remained stable even during prolonged interactions, demonstrating its ability to balance rapport building with effective information elicitation. These results show that RaPSIL enables socially aware AI interviewers capable of eliciting sensitive personal information while maintaining user trust and comfort—an essential capability for real-world dialogue systems.