GeMTeX is a large-scale German Medical Text Corpus project with the goal to publish a clinical national reference corpus. The resource is currently under construction and comprises, as of February 2026, more than 15k clinical documents (20M tokens) from six German university hospitals. When building GeMTeX, attention was paid to comply with European regulatory requirements. In phase I, patients were asked to allow reuse of their clinical documents based on the legal foundation of an "informed consent". In phase II, consented documents from six major clinical sites in Germany underwent a thorough de-identification process. In phase III, we currently enrich this unlocked dataset with semantic information from the clinical domain. This annotation process is guided by Snomed CT, which supports to directly ground expressions within clinical documents in a worldwide shared medical documentation and ontology standard. The resource is currently under active development and is accessible upon request under controlled access conditions. We refer interested researchers to visit https://kiinformatik.mri.tum.de/en/gemtex or reach out via gemtex.mi@mh.tum.de.

Due to strict privacy regulations, text corpora in non-English clinical contexts are scarce. Consequently, synthetic data generation using Large Language Models (LLMs) emerges as a promising strategy to address this data gap. To evaluate the ability of LLMs in generating synthetic data, we applied them to our novel German Medical Interview Questions Corpus (GerMedIQ), which consists of 4,524 unique, simulated question-response pairs in German. We augmented our corpus by prompting 18 different LLMs to generate responses to the same questions. Structural and semantic evaluations of the generated responses revealed that large-sized language models produced responses comparable to those provided by humans. Additionally, an LLM-as-a-judge study, combined with a human baseline experiment assessing response acceptability, demonstrated that human raters preferred the responses generated by Mistral (124B) over those produced by humans. Nonetheless, our findings indicate that using LLMs for data augmentation in non-English clinical contexts requires caution.