Daniel Ziembicki
2026
POLAR: A Corpus of Questions, Responses and Argumentation in Polish Political Radio Discourse
Daniel Ziembicki | Aleksandra Zwierzchowska | Ewelina Sobol | Katarzyna Anna Przerada
Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
Daniel Ziembicki | Aleksandra Zwierzchowska | Ewelina Sobol | Katarzyna Anna Przerada
Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
In this paper, we present POLAR: an experimental dataset designed to investigate question–answer structures in political interviews. The study also aims to integrate this level of annotation with the identification of argumentative structures. The dataset comprises orthographic transcriptions of Polish political radio interviews conducted between December 2023 and March 2024, with a total duration of nearly 10 hours of recordings (94,015 tokens). Manual annotation was performed on three levels: (a) identification of questions as speech acts, (b) classification of responses to questions, and (c) argumentative structures in which interrogative sentences function as premises or conclusions. The results show that not all interrogative sentences function as questions in the sense of requesting information — 23% do not serve this function, while 13% were identified as components of argumentative structures. We also introduce a gold-standard corpus, together with baseline experiments and LLM-based evaluations, demonstrating the usefulness of the resource for both theoretical research and NLP applications.
2025
Where Frameworks (Dis)agree: A Study of Discourse Segmentation
Maciej Ogrodniczuk | Anna Latusek | Karolina Saputa | Alina Wróblewska | Daniel Ziembicki | Bartosz Żuk | Martyna Lewandowska | Adam Okrasiński | Paulina Rosalska | Anna Śliwicka | Aleksandra Tomaszewska | Sebastian Żurowski
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse, Context and Document-Level Inferences (CODI 2025)
Maciej Ogrodniczuk | Anna Latusek | Karolina Saputa | Alina Wróblewska | Daniel Ziembicki | Bartosz Żuk | Martyna Lewandowska | Adam Okrasiński | Paulina Rosalska | Anna Śliwicka | Aleksandra Tomaszewska | Sebastian Żurowski
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse, Context and Document-Level Inferences (CODI 2025)
This study addresses the fundamental task of discourse unit detection – the critical initial step in discourse parsing. We analyze how various discourse frameworks conceptualize and structure discourse units, with a focus on their underlying taxonomies and theoretical assumptions. While approaches to discourse segmentation vary considerably, the extent to which these conceptual divergences influence practical implementations remains insufficiently studied. To address this gap, we investigate similarities and differences in segmentation across several English datasets, segmented and annotated according to distinct discourse frameworks, using a simple, rule-based heuristics. We evaluate the effectiveness of rules with respect to gold-standard segmentation, while also checking variability and cross-framework generalizability. Additionally, we conduct a manual comparison of a sample of rule-based segmentation outputs against benchmark segmentation, identifying points of convergence and divergence.Our findings indicate that discourse frameworks align strongly at the level of segmentation: particular clauses consistently serve as the primary boundaries of discourse units. Discrepancies arise mainly in the treatment of other structures, such as adpositional phrases, appositions, interjections, and parenthesised text segments, which are inconsistently marked as separate discourse units across formalisms.
2024
Polish Discourse Corpus (PDC): Corpus Design, ISO-Compliant Annotation, Data Highlights, and Parser Development
Maciej Ogrodniczuk | Aleksandra Tomaszewska | Daniel Ziembicki | Sebastian Żurowski | Ryszard Tuora | Aleksandra Zwierzchowska
Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)
Maciej Ogrodniczuk | Aleksandra Tomaszewska | Daniel Ziembicki | Sebastian Żurowski | Ryszard Tuora | Aleksandra Zwierzchowska
Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)
This paper presents the Polish Discourse Corpus, a pioneering resource of this kind for Polish and the first corpus in Poland to employ the ISO standard for discourse relation annotation. The Polish Discourse Corpus adopts ISO 24617-8, a segment of the Language Resource Management – Semantic Annotation Framework (SemAF), which outlines a set of core discourse relations adaptable for diverse languages and genres. The paper overviews the corpus architecture, annotation procedures, the challenges that the annotators have encountered, as well as key statistical data concerning discourse relations and connectives in the corpus. It further discusses the initial phases of the discourse parser tailored for the ISO 24617-8 framework. Evaluations on the efficacy and potential refinement areas of the corpus annotation and parsing strategies are also presented. The final part of the paper touches upon anticipated research plans to improve discourse analysis techniques in the project and to conduct discourse studies involving multiple languages.
2023
Adopting ISO 24617-8 for Discourse Relations Annotation in Polish:Challenges and Future Directions
Sebastian Zurowski | Daniel Ziembicki | Aleksandra Tomaszewska | Maciej Ogrodniczuk | Agata Drozd
Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge
Sebastian Zurowski | Daniel Ziembicki | Aleksandra Tomaszewska | Maciej Ogrodniczuk | Agata Drozd
Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge
2019
Named Entity Recognition - Is There a Glass Ceiling?
Tomasz Stanislawek | Anna Wróblewska | Alicja Wójcicka | Daniel Ziembicki | Przemyslaw Biecek
Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL)
Tomasz Stanislawek | Anna Wróblewska | Alicja Wójcicka | Daniel Ziembicki | Przemyslaw Biecek
Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL)
Recent developments in Named Entity Recognition (NER) have resulted in better and better models. However, is there a glass ceiling? Do we know which types of errors are still hard or even impossible to correct? In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of the types of errors in state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods. Our study illustrates weak and strong points of the Stanford, CMU, FLAIR, ELMO and BERT models, as well as their shared limitations. We also introduce new techniques for improving annotation, training process, and for checking model quality and stability.