Shaurya Rohatgi
2026
Do Large Multimodal Models Solve Caption Generation for Scientific Figures? Lessons Learned from SciCap Challenge 2023
Ting-Yao Hsu | Yi-Li Hsu | Shaurya Rohatgi | Chieh-Yang Huang | Ho Yin Sam Ng | Ryan Rossi | Sungchul Kim | Tong Yu | Lun-Wei Ku | Clyde Lee Giles | Ting-Hao Huang
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 14
Ting-Yao Hsu | Yi-Li Hsu | Shaurya Rohatgi | Chieh-Yang Huang | Ho Yin Sam Ng | Ryan Rossi | Sungchul Kim | Tong Yu | Lun-Wei Ku | Clyde Lee Giles | Ting-Hao Huang
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 14
Since the SciCap dataset’s launch in 2021, the research community has made significant progress in generating captions for scientific figures in scholarly articles. In 2023, the first SciCap Challenge took place, inviting global teams to use an expanded SciCap dataset to develop models for captioning diverse figure types across various academic fields. At the same time, text generation models advanced quickly, with many powerful pre-trained large multimodal models (LMMs) emerging that showed impressive capabilities in various vision-and-language tasks. This paper presents an overview of the first SciCap Challenge and details the performance of various models on its data, capturing a snapshot of the field’s state. We found that professional editors overwhelmingly preferred figure captions generated by GPT-4V over those from all other models and even the original captions written by authors. Following this key finding, we conducted detailed analyses to answer this question: Have advanced LMMs solved the task of generating captions for scientific figures?
2023
The ACL OCL Corpus: Advancing Open Science in Computational Linguistics
Shaurya Rohatgi | Yanxia Qin | Benjamin Aw | Niranjana Unnithan | Min-Yen Kan
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Shaurya Rohatgi | Yanxia Qin | Benjamin Aw | Niranjana Unnithan | Min-Yen Kan
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
We present ACL OCL, a scholarly corpus derived from the ACL Anthology to assist Open scientific research in the Computational Linguistics domain. Integrating and enhancing the previous versions of the ACL Anthology, the ACL OCL contributes metadata, PDF files, citation graphs and additional structured full texts with sections, figures, and links to a large knowledge resource (Semantic Scholar). The ACL OCL spans seven decades, containing 73K papers, alongside 210K figures. We spotlight how ACL OCL applies to observe trends in computational linguistics. By detecting paper topics with a supervised neural model, we note that interest in “Syntax: Tagging, Chunking and Parsing” is waning and “Natural Language Generation” is resurging. Our dataset is available from HuggingFace (https://huggingface.co/datasets/WINGNUS/ACL-OCL).
Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation
Jason Lucas | Adaku Uchendu | Michiharu Yamashita | Jooyoung Lee | Shaurya Rohatgi | Dongwon Lee
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Jason Lucas | Adaku Uchendu | Michiharu Yamashita | Jooyoung Lee | Shaurya Rohatgi | Dongwon Lee
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Recent ubiquity and disruptive impacts of large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their potential to be misused (*.i.e, generating large-scale harmful and misleading content*). To combat this emerging risk of LLMs, we propose a novel “***Fighting Fire with Fire***” (F3) strategy that harnesses modern LLMs’ generative and emergent reasoning capabilities to counter human-written and LLM-generated disinformation. First, we leverage GPT-3.5-turbo to synthesize authentic and deceptive LLM-generated content through paraphrase-based and perturbation-based prefix-style prompts, respectively. Second, we apply zero-shot in-context semantic reasoning techniques with cloze-style prompts to discern genuine from deceptive posts and news articles. In our extensive experiments, we observe GPT-3.5-turbo’s zero-shot superiority for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, where GPT-3.5-turbo consistently achieved accuracy at 68-72%, unlike the decline observed in previous customized and fine-tuned disinformation detectors. Our codebase and dataset are available at https://github.com/mickeymst/F3.