The development of unbiased large language models is widely recognized as crucial, yet existing benchmarks fall short in detecting biases due to limited scope, contamination, and lack of a fairness baseline. SAGED(bias) is the first holistic benchmarking pipeline to address these problems. The pipeline encompasses five core stages: scraping materials, assembling benchmarks, generating responses, extracting numeric features, and diagnosing with disparity metrics. SAGED includes metrics for max disparity, such as impact ratio, and bias concentration, such as Max Z-scores. Noticing that metric tool bias and contextual bias in prompts can distort evaluation, SAGED implements counterfactual branching and baseline calibration for mitigation. For demonstration, we use SAGED on G20 Countries with popular 8b-level models including Gemma2, Llama3.1, Mistral, and Qwen2. With sentiment analysis, we find that while Mistral and Qwen2 show lower max disparity and higher bias concentration than Gemma2 and Llama3.1, all models are notably biased against countries like Russia and (except for Qwen2) China. With further experiments to have models role-playing U.S. presidents, we see bias amplifies and shifts in heterogeneous directions. Moreover, we see Qwen2 and Mistral not engage in role-playing, while Llama3.1 and Gemma2 role-play Trump notably more intensively than Biden and Harris, indicating role-playing performance bias in these models.

Model collapse—a phenomenon where models degrade in performance due to indiscriminate use of synthetic data—is well studied. However, its role in bias amplification—the progressive reinforcement of pre-existing social biases in Large Language Models (LLMs)—remains underexplored. In this paper, we formally define the conditions for bias amplification and demonstrate through statistical simulations that bias can intensify even in the absence of sampling errors, the primary driver of model collapse. Empirically, we investigate political bias amplification in GPT-2 using a custom-built benchmark for sentence continuation tasks. Our findings reveal a progressively increasing right-leaning bias. Furthermore, we evaluate three mitigation strategies—Overfitting, Preservation, and Accumulation—and show that bias amplification persists even when model collapse is mitigated. Finally, a mechanistic interpretation identifies distinct sets of neurons responsible for model collapse and bias amplification, suggesting they arise from different underlying mechanisms.