Accurate assessment of generated chart quality is crucial for automated document creation and editing across diverse applications like finance, medicine, policy making, and education. Current evaluation approaches suffer from significant limitations: human evaluation is costly and difficult to scale, pixel-based metrics ignore data accuracy, while data-centric measures overlook design quality. Recent multimodal LLM evaluators show promise but exhibit concerning inconsistencies due to prompt sensitivity and subjective biases. Existing metrics fail to evaluate chart quality holistically across visual similarity, semantic alignment, and data fidelity, often producing misleading scores that unfairly penalize good charts while rewarding bad ones. We introduce ChartEval, a novel chart evaluation system that compares generated chart images with ground truth by leveraging scene graph parsing to decompose chart images into hierarchical scene graphs of chart objects, attributes, and relations. Subsequently, it applies graph-based similarity measures to compare candidate chart scene graphs against reference scene graphs for measuring chart quality. We demonstrate that our evaluation approach achieves significantly stronger correlation with human judgments compared to existing metrics like GPT-Score, SSIM, and SCRM using a comprehensive benchmark of 4K chart images paired with generation intents and human quality ratings. We demonstrate the utility of the ChartEval system as a reliable automatic chart quality metric on diverse tasks, including language-guided chart editing, chart reconstruction, and text-to-chart synthesis using both open-source and API-based LLMs.

Understanding information from a collection of multiple documents, particularly those with visually rich elements, is important for document-grounded question answering. This paper introduces VisDoMBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate QA systems in multi-document settings with rich multimodal content, including tables, charts, and presentation slides. We propose VisDoMRAG, a novel multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach that simultaneously utilizes visual and textual RAG, combining robust visual retrieval capabilities with sophisticated linguistic reasoning. VisDoMRAG employs a multi-step reasoning process encompassing evidence curation and chain-of-thought reasoning for concurrent textual and visual RAG pipelines. A key novelty of VisDoMRAG is its consistency-constrained modality fusion mechanism, which aligns the reasoning processes across modalities at inference time to produce a coherent final answer. This leads to enhanced accuracy in scenarios where critical information is distributed across modalities and improved answer verifiability through implicit context attribution. Through extensive experiments involving open-source and proprietary large language models, we benchmark state-of-the-art document QA methods on VisDoMBench. Extensive results show that VisDoMRAG outperforms unimodal and long-context LLM baselines for end-to-end multimodal document QA by 12-20%.