Stance detection is a pivotal task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), identifying textual attitudes toward various targets. Despite advances in using Large Language Models (LLMs), challenges persist due to hallucination-models generating plausible yet inaccurate content. Addressing these challenges, we introduce MPVStance, a framework that incorporates Multi-Perspective Verification (MPV) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) across a structured five-step verification process. Our method enhances stance detection by rigorously validating each response from factual accuracy, logical consistency, contextual relevance, and other perspectives. Extensive testing on the SemEval-2016 and VAST datasets, including scenarios that challenge existing methods and comprehensive ablation studies, demonstrates that MPVStance significantly outperforms current models. It effectively mitigates hallucination issues and sets new benchmarks for reliability and accuracy in stance detection, particularly in zero-shot, few-shot, and challenging scenarios.

Stance detection, a critical task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), aims to identify the attitude expressed in text toward specific targets. Despite advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), challenges such as limited interpretability and handling nuanced content persist. To address these issues, we propose the Multi-Path Reasoning Framework (MPRF), a novel framework that generates, evaluates, and integrates multiple reasoning paths to improve accuracy, robustness, and transparency in stance detection. Unlike prior work that relies on single-path reasoning or static explanations, MPRF introduces a structured end-to-end pipeline: it first generates diverse reasoning paths through predefined perspectives, then dynamically evaluates and optimizes each path using LLM-based scoring, and finally fuses the results via weighted aggregation to produce interpretable and reliable predictions. Extensive experiments on the SEM16, VAST, and PStance datasets demonstrate that MPRF outperforms existing models. Ablation studies further validate the critical role of MPRF’s components, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing interpretability and handling complex stance detection tasks.

Multimodal Stance Detection (MSD) aims to determine a user’s stance - support, oppose, or neutral - toward a target by analyzing multimodal content such as texts and images from social media. Existing MSD methods struggle with generalizing to unseen targets and handling modality inconsistencies. To address these challenges, we propose the Target-driven Multi-modal Alignment and Dynamic Weighting Model (T-MAD), which combines target-driven multi-modal alignment and dynamic weighting mechanisms to capture target-specific relationships and balance modality contributions. The model incorporates iterative reasoning to iteratively refine predictions, achieving robust performance in both in-target and zero-shot settings. Experiments on the MMSD and MultiClimate datasets show that T-MAD outperforms state-of-the-art models, with optimal results achieved using RoBERTa, ViT, and an iterative depth of 5. Ablation studies further confirm the importance of multi-modal alignment and dynamic weighting in enhancing model effectiveness.