Understanding long-form videos, such as movies and TV episodes ranging from tens of minutes to two hours, remains a significant challenge for multi-modal models. Existing benchmarks often fail to test the full range of cognitive skills needed to process these temporally rich and narratively complex inputs. Therefore, we introduce InfiniBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of models in long video understanding rigorously.InfiniBench offers:(1) Over 1,000 hours of video content, with an average video length of 53 minutes.(2) The largest set of question-answer pairs for long video comprehension, totaling around 87.7 K.(3) Eight diverse skills that span both grounding-based (e.g., scene transitions, character actions) and reasoning-based (e.g., deep context understanding, multi-event linking).(4) Rich annotation formats, including both multiple-choice and open-ended questions.We conducted an in-depth evaluation across both commercial (GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash) and most recent open-source vision-language models, such as Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3.0). Results reveal that:(1) Models struggle across the board: Even the best model, GPT-4o, achieves only 47.1% on grounding-based skills, with most models performing near or just above random chance.(2) Strong reliance on world knowledge: Models achieve surprisingly high scores using only metadata (e.g., video titles), highlighting a tendency to rely on pre-trained knowledge rather than actual visual or temporal understanding.(3) Multi-Modal Importance: When provided with full video and subtitle context, however, models show substantial improvements, confirming the critical role of multimodal input in video understanding.Our findings underscore the inherent challenges in long-video comprehension and point to the need for substantial advancements in both grounding and reasoning capabilities in MLLMs.

Large language models (LLMs) hold promise for therapeutic interventions, yet most existing datasets rely solely on text, overlooking non-verbal emotional cues essential to real-world therapy. To address this, we introduce a multimodal dataset of 1,441 publicly sourced therapy session videos containing both dialogue and non-verbal signals such as facial expressions and vocal tone. Inspired by Hochschild’s concept of emotional labor, we propose a computational formulation of emotional dissonance—the mismatch between facial and vocal emotion—and use it to guide emotionally aware prompting. Our experiments show that integrating multimodal cues, especially dissonance, improves the quality of generated interventions. We also find that LLM-based evaluators misalign with expert assessments in this domain, highlighting the need for human-centered evaluation. Data and code will be released to support future research.

Research in vision and language has made considerable progress thanks to benchmarks such as COCO. COCO captions focused on unambiguous facts in English; ArtEmis introduced subjective emotions and ArtELingo introduced some multilinguality (Chinese and Arabic). However we believe there should be more multilinguality. Hence, we present ArtELingo-28, a vision-language benchmark that spans 28 languages and encompasses approximately 200,000 annotations (140 annotations per image). Traditionally, vision research focused on unambiguous class labels, whereas ArtELingo-28 emphasizes diversity of opinions over languages and cultures. The challenge is to build machine learning systems that assign emotional captions to images. Baseline results will be presented for three novel conditions: Zero-Shot, Few-Shot and One-vs-All Zero-Shot. We find that cross-lingual transfer is more successful for culturally-related languages. Data and code will be made publicly available.

This paper introduces ArtELingo, a new benchmark and dataset, designed to encourage work on diversity across languages and cultures. Following ArtEmis, a collection of 80k artworks from WikiArt with 0.45M emotion labels and English-only captions, ArtELingo adds another 0.79M annotations in Arabic and Chinese, plus 4.8K in Spanish to evaluate “cultural-transfer” performance. 51K artworks have 5 annotations or more in 3 languages. This diversity makes it possible to study similarities and differences across languages and cultures. Further, we investigate captioning tasks, and find diversity improves the performance of baseline models. ArtELingo is publicly available at ‘www.artelingo.org‘ with standard splits and baseline models. We hope our work will help ease future research on multilinguality and culturally-aware AI.