Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential for data annotation, markedly reducing the labor costs associated with downstream applications. However, existing methods mostly adopt an aggressive strategy by prompting LLM to determine a single gold label for each unlabeled sample. Due to the inherent uncertainty within LLMs, they often produce incorrect labels for difficult samples, severely compromising the data quality for downstream applications. Motivated by ambiguity aversion in human behaviors, we propose a novel candidate annotation paradigm wherein large language models are encouraged to output all possible labels when incurring uncertainty. To ensure unique labels are provided for downstream tasks, we develop a teacher-student framework CanDist that distills candidate annotations with a Small Language Model (SLM). We further provide a rigorous justification demonstrating that distilling candidate annotations from the teacher LLM offers superior theoretical guarantees compared to directly using single annotations. Extensive experiments across six text classification tasks validate the effectiveness of our proposed method. The source code is available at https://github.com/MingxuanXia/CanDist.

Hierarchical text classification aims to classify documents into multiple labels within a hierarchical taxonomy, making it an essential yet challenging task in natural language processing. Recently, using Large Language Models (LLM) to tackle hierarchical text classification in a zero-shot manner has attracted increasing attention due to their cost-efficiency and flexibility. Given the challenges of understanding the hierarchy, various HTC prompting strategies have been explored to elicit the best performance from LLMs.However, our empirical study reveals that LLMs are highly sensitive to these prompting strategies—(i) within a task, different strategies yield substantially different results, and (ii) across various tasks, the relative effectiveness of a given strategy varies significantly. To address this, we propose a novel ensemble method, HiEPS, which integrates the results of diverse prompting strategies to promote LLMs’ reliability. We also introduce a path-valid voting mechanism for ensembling, which selects a valid result with the highest path frequency score. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets show that HiEPS boosts the performance of single prompting strategies and achieves SOTA results. The source code is available at https://github.com/MingxuanXia/HiEPS.

High-quality annotated data is a cornerstone of modern Natural Language Processing (NLP). While recent methods begin to leverage diverse annotation sources—including Large Language Models (LLMs), Small Language Models (SLMs), and human experts—they often focus narrowly on the labeling step itself. A critical gap remains in the holistic process control required to manage these sources dynamically, addressing complex scheduling and quality-cost trade-offs in a unified manner. Inspired by real-world crowdsourcing companies, we introduce CrowdAgent, a multi-agent system that provides end-to-end process control by integrating task assignment, data annotation, and quality/cost management. It implements a novel methodology that rationally assigns tasks, enabling LLMs, SLMs, and human experts to advance synergistically in a collaborative annotation workflow. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CrowdAgent through extensive experiments on six diverse multimodal classification tasks. The source code and video demo are available at https://github.com/QMMMS/CrowdAgent.