Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have yielded impressive successes on many language tasks. However, efficient processing of long contexts using LLMs remains a significant challenge. We introduce **EpMAN** – a method for processing long contexts in an episodic memory module while holistically attending to semantically-relevant context chunks. Output from episodic attention is then used to reweigh the decoder’s self-attention to the stored KV cache of the context during training and generation. When an LLM decoder is trained using **EpMAN**, its performance on multiple challenging single-hop long-context recall and question-answering benchmarks is found to be stronger and more robust across the range from 16k to 256k tokens than baseline decoders trained with self-attention, and popular retrieval-augmented generation frameworks.

Understanding long-form videos, such as movies and TV episodes ranging from tens of minutes to two hours, remains a significant challenge for multi-modal models. Existing benchmarks often fail to test the full range of cognitive skills needed to process these temporally rich and narratively complex inputs. Therefore, we introduce InfiniBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of models in long video understanding rigorously.InfiniBench offers:(1) Over 1,000 hours of video content, with an average video length of 53 minutes.(2) The largest set of question-answer pairs for long video comprehension, totaling around 87.7 K.(3) Eight diverse skills that span both grounding-based (e.g., scene transitions, character actions) and reasoning-based (e.g., deep context understanding, multi-event linking).(4) Rich annotation formats, including both multiple-choice and open-ended questions.We conducted an in-depth evaluation across both commercial (GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash) and most recent open-source vision-language models, such as Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3.0). Results reveal that:(1) Models struggle across the board: Even the best model, GPT-4o, achieves only 47.1% on grounding-based skills, with most models performing near or just above random chance.(2) Strong reliance on world knowledge: Models achieve surprisingly high scores using only metadata (e.g., video titles), highlighting a tendency to rely on pre-trained knowledge rather than actual visual or temporal understanding.(3) Multi-Modal Importance: When provided with full video and subtitle context, however, models show substantial improvements, confirming the critical role of multimodal input in video understanding.Our findings underscore the inherent challenges in long-video comprehension and point to the need for substantial advancements in both grounding and reasoning capabilities in MLLMs.

Although speech language models are expected to align well with brain language processing during speech comprehension, recent studies have found that they fail to capture brain-relevant semantics beyond low-level features. Surprisingly, text-based language models exhibit stronger alignment with brain language regions, as they better capture brain-relevant semantics. However, no prior work has examined the alignment effectiveness of text/speech representations from multimodal models. This raises several key questions: Can speech embeddings from such multimodal models capture brain-relevant semantics through cross-modal interactions? Which modality can take advantage of this synergistic multimodal understanding to improve alignment with brain language processing? Can text/speech representations from such multimodal models outperform unimodal models? To address these questions, we systematically analyze multiple multimodal models, extracting both text- and speech-based representations to assess their alignment with MEG brain recordings during naturalistic story listening. We find that text embeddings from both multimodal and unimodal models significantly outperform speech embeddings from these models. Specifically, multimodal text embeddings exhibit a peak around 200 ms, suggesting that they benefit from speech embeddings, with heightened activity during this time period. However, speech embeddings from these multimodal models still show a similar alignment compared to their unimodal counterparts, suggesting that they do not gain meaningful semantic benefits over text-based representations. These results highlight an asymmetry in cross-modal knowledge transfer, where the text modality benefits more from speech information, but not vice versa.

Combating disinformation is one of the burning societal crises - about 67% of the American population believes that disinformation produces a lot of uncertainty, and 10% of them knowingly propagate disinformation. Evidence shows that disinformation can manipulate democratic processes and public opinion, causing disruption in the share market, panic and anxiety in society, and even death during crises. Therefore, disinformation should be identified promptly and, if possible, mitigated. With approximately 3.2 billion images and 720,000 hours of video shared online daily on social media platforms, scalable detection of multimodal disinformation requires efficient fact verification. Despite progress in automatic text-based fact verification (e.g., FEVER, LIAR), the research community lacks substantial effort in multimodal fact verification. To address this gap, we introduce FACTIFY 3M, a dataset of 3 million samples that pushes the boundaries of the domain of fact verification via a multimodal fake news dataset, in addition to offering explainability through the concept of 5W question-answering. Salient features of the dataset include: (i) textual claims, (ii) ChatGPT-generated paraphrased claims, (iii) associated images, (iv) stable diffusion-generated additional images (i.e., visual paraphrases), (v) pixel-level image heatmap to foster image-text explainability of the claim, (vi) 5W QA pairs, and (vii) adversarial fake news stories.