In real world translation scenarios, terminology is rarely one-to-one. Instead, multiple valid translations may appear in a terminology dictionary, but correctness of a translation depends on corporate style guides and context. This can be challenging for neural machine translation (NMT) systems. Luckily, in a corporate context, many examples of human post-edits of valid but incorrect terminology exist. The goal of this work is to learn how to disambiguate our terminology based on these corrections. Our approach is based on preference optimization, using the term post-edit as the knowledge to be preferred. While previous work had to rely on unambiguous translation dictionaries to set hard constraints during decoding, or to add soft constraints in the input, our framework requires neither one-to-one dictionaries nor human intervention at decoding time. We report results on English-German post-edited data and find that the optimal combination of supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization, with both term-specific and full sequence objectives, yields statistically significant improvements in term accuracy over a strong translation oriented LLM without significant losses in COMET score. Additionally, we release test sets from our post-edited data and terminology dictionary.

Recent works have shown that prompting large language models (LLMs) is effective for translation with markup where LLMs can simultaneously transfer markup tags while ensuring that the content, both inside and outside tag pairs is correctly translated. However, these works make a rather unrealistic assumption of the existence of high-quality parallel sentences with markup for prompting. Furthermore, the impact of instruction fine-tuning (IFT) in this setting is unknown. In this paper, we provide a study, the first of its kind, focusing on the effectiveness of synthetically created markup data and IFT for translation with markup using LLMs. We focus on translation from English to five European languages, German, French, Dutch, Finnish and Russian, where we show that regardless of few-shot prompting or IFT, synthetic data created via word alignments, while leading to inferior markup transfer compared to using original data with markups, does not negatively impact the translation quality. Furthermore, IFT mainly impacts the translation quality compared to few-shot prompting and has slightly better markup transfer capabilities than the latter. We hope our work will help practitioners make effective decisions on modeling choices for LLM based translation with markup.

In this paper, we study the translation abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for business IT texts.We are strongly interested in domain adaptation of translation systems, which is essential for accurate and lexically appropriate translation of such texts.Among the open-source models evaluated in a zero- and few-shot setting, we find Llama-2 13B the most promising for domain-specific translation fine-tuning.We investigate the full range of adaptation techniques for LLMs: from prompting, over parameter-efficient fine-tuning to full fine-tuning, and compare to classic neural machine translation (MT) models trained internally at SAP.We provide guidance how to use training budget most effectively for different fine-tuning approaches.We observe that while LLMs can translate on-par with SAP’s MT models on general domain data, it is difficult to close the gap on SAP’s domain-specific data, even with extensive training and carefully curated data.