Large language models (LLMs) excel at various natural language processing tasks, but their tendency to generate hallucinations undermines their reliability. Existing hallucination detection methods leveraging hidden states predominantly focus on static and isolated representations, overlooking their dynamic evolution across layers, which limits efficacy. To address this limitation, we shift the focus to the hidden state update process and introduce a novel metric, the **ICR** Score (**I**nformation **C**ontribution to **R**esidual Stream), which quantifies the contribution of modules to the hidden states’ update. We empirically validate that the ICR Score is effective and reliable in distinguishing hallucinations. Building on these insights, we propose a hallucination detection method, the ICR Probe, which captures the cross-layer evolution of hidden states. Experimental results show that the ICR Probe achieves superior performance with significantly fewer parameters. Furthermore, ablation studies and case analyses offer deeper insights into the underlying mechanism of this method, improving its interpretability.

While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks, they remain vulnerable to generating outputs that are potentially harmful. Red teaming, which involves crafting adversarial inputs to expose vulnerabilities, is a widely adopted approach for evaluating the robustness of these models. Prior studies have indicated that LLMs are susceptible to vulnerabilities exposed through multi-turn interactions as opposed to single-turn scenarios. Nevertheless, existing methods for multi-turn attacks mainly utilize a predefined dialogue pattern, limiting their effectiveness in realistic situations. Effective attacks require adaptive dialogue strategies that respond dynamically to the initial user prompt and the evolving context of the conversation. To address these limitations, we propose DAMON, a novel multi-turn jailbreak attack method. DAMON leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to systematically explore multi-turn conversational spaces, efficiently identifying sub-instruction sequences that induce harmful responses. We evaluate DAMON’s efficacy across five LLMs and three datasets. Our experimental results show that DAMON can effectively induce undesired behaviors.

Text-to-image models frequently fail to achieve perfect alignment with textual prompts, particularly in maintaining proper semantic binding between semantic elements in the given prompt. Existing approaches typically require costly retraining or focus on only correctly generating the attributes of entities (entity-attribute binding), ignoring the cruciality of correctly generating the relations between entities (entity-relation-entity binding), resulting in unsatisfactory semantic binding performance. In this work, we propose a novel training-free method R-Bind that simultaneously improves both entity-attribute and entity-relation-entity binding. Our method introduces three inference-time optimization losses that adjust attention maps during generation. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple datasets demonstrate our approach’s effectiveness, validity, and flexibility in enhancing semantic binding without additional training.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, highlighting the importance of knowledge editing. Many benchmark has been proposed for researching multimodal knowledge editing. However, previous benchmarks focus on limited scenarios due to the lack of rigorous definition of multimodal knowledge. To better evaluate multimodal knowledge editing, we propose a decomposed definition of multimodal knowledge. Following the decomposed definition of multimodal knowledge, we introduce three scenarios and a novel requirement modality consistency. We construct MC-MKE, a fine-grained **M**ultimodal **K**nowledge **E**diting benchmark emphasizing **M**odality **C**onsistency through strict data selection. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.

Large language models (LLMs) are known to be trained on vast amounts of data, which may unintentionally or intentionally include data from commonly used benchmarks. This inclusion can lead to cheatingly high scores on model leaderboards, yet result in disappointing performance in real-world applications. To address this benchmark contamination problem, we first propose a set of requirements that practical contamination detection methods should follow. Following these proposed requirements, we introduce PaCoST, a Paired Confidence Significance Testing to effectively detect benchmark contamination in LLMs. Our method constructs a counterpart for each piece of data with the same distribution, and performs statistical analysis of the corresponding confidence to test whether the model is significantly more confident under the original benchmark. We validate the effectiveness of PaCoST and apply it on popular open-source models and benchmarks. We find that almost all models and benchmarks we tested are suspected contaminated more or less. We finally call for new LLM evaluation methods.

Hyperbole, or exaggeration, is a common linguistic phenomenon. The detection of hyperbole is an important part of understanding human expression. There have been several studies on hyperbole detection, but most of which focus on text modality only. However, with the development of social media, people can create hyperbolic expressions with various modalities, including text, images, videos, etc. In this paper, we focus on multimodal hyperbole detection. We create a multimodal detection dataset from Weibo (a Chinese social media) and carry out some studies on it. We treat the text and image from a piece of weibo as two modalities and explore the role of text and image for hyperbole detection. Different pre-trained multimodal encoders are also evaluated on this downstream task to show their performance. Besides, since this dataset is constructed from five different keywords, we also evaluate the cross-domain performance of different models. These studies can serve as a benchmark and point out the direction of further study on multimodal hyperbole detection.