This study conducts a detailed analysis of the side effects of rank-one knowledge editing using language models with controlled knowledge. The analysis focuses on each element of knowledge triples (subject, relation, object) and examines two aspects: “knowledge that causes large side effects when edited” and “knowledge that is affected by the side effects.” Our findings suggest that editing knowledge with subjects that have relationships with numerous objects or are robustly embedded within the LM may trigger extensive side effects. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the similarity between relation vectors, the density of object vectors, and the distortion of knowledge representations are closely related to how susceptible knowledge is to editing influences. The findings of this research provide new insights into the mechanisms of side effects in LM knowledge editing and indicate specific directions for developing more effective and reliable knowledge editing methods.

Evaluating the outputs of large language models (LLMs) on long-form generative tasks remains challenging. While fine-grained, aspect-wise evaluations provide valuable diagnostic information, they are difficult to design exhaustively, and each aspect’s contribution to the overall acceptability of an answer is unclear. In this study, we propose a method to compute an overall quality score as a weighted average of three key aspects: factuality, informative- ness, and formality. This approach achieves stronger correlations with human judgments compared to previous metrics. Our analysis identifies factuality as the most predictive aspect of overall quality. Additionally, we release a dataset of 1.2k long-form QA answers annotated with both absolute judgments and relative preferences in overall and aspect-wise schemes to aid future research in evaluation practices.

According to the stages-of-inference hypothesis, early layers of language models map their subword-tokenized input, which does not necessarily correspond to a linguistically meaningful segmentation, to more meaningful representations that form the model’s “inner vocabulary”.Prior analysis of this *detokenization* stage has predominantly relied on probing and interventions such as path patching, which involve selecting particular inputs, choosing a subset of components that will be patched, and then observing changes in model behavior.Here, we show that several important aspects of the detokenization stage can be understood purely by analyzing model weights, without performing any model inference steps.Specifically, we introduce an analytical decomposition of first-layer attention in GPT-2.Our decomposition yields interpretable terms that quantify the relative contributions of position-related, token-related, and mixed effects.By focusing on terms in this decomposition, we discover weight-based explanations of attention bias toward close tokens and attention for detokenization.

Factual probing is a method that uses prompts to test if a language model “knows” certain world knowledge facts. A problem in factual probing is that small changes to the prompt can lead to large changes in model output. Previous work aimed to alleviate this problem by optimizing prompts via text mining or fine-tuning. However, such approaches are relation-specific and do not generalize to unseen relation types. Here, we propose to use test-time augmentation (TTA) as a relation-agnostic method for reducing sensitivity to prompt variations by automatically augmenting and ensembling prompts at test time. Experiments show improved model calibration, i.e., with TTA, model confidence better reflects prediction accuracy. Improvements in prediction accuracy are observed for some models, but for other models, TTA leads to degradation. Error analysis identifies the difficulty of producing high-quality prompt variations as the main challenge for TTA.