Afrah Altamimi


2025

pdf bib
Evaluation of Large Language Models on Arabic Punctuation Prediction
Asma Ali Al Wazrah | Afrah Altamimi | Hawra Aljasim | Waad Alshammari | Rawan Al-Matham | Omar Elnashar | Mohamed Amin | Abdulrahman AlOsaimy
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Languages Using Arabic Script

The linguistic inclusivity of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Gemni, JAIS, and AceGPT has not been sufficiently explored, particularly in their handling of low-resource languages like Arabic compared to English. While these models have shown impressive performance across various tasks, their effectiveness in Arabic remains under-examined. Punctuation, critical for sentence structure and comprehension in tasks like speech analysis, synthesis, and machine translation, requires precise prediction. This paper assesses seven LLMs: GPT4-o, Gemni1.5, JAIS, AceGPT, SILMA, ALLaM, and CommandR+ for Arabic punctuation prediction. Additionally, the performance of fine-tuned AraBERT is compared with these models in zero-shot and few-shot settings using a proposed Arabic punctuation prediction corpus of 10,044 sentences. The experiments demonstrate that while AraBERT performs well for specific punctuation marks, LLMs show significant promise in zero-shot learning, with further improvements in few-shot scenarios. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to enhance the automation and accuracy of Arabic text processing.

pdf bib
BALSAM: A Platform for Benchmarking Arabic Large Language Models
Rawan Nasser Almatham | Kareem Mohamed Darwish | Raghad Al-Rasheed | Waad Thuwaini Alshammari | Muneera Alhoshan | Amal Almazrua | Asma Al Wazrah | Mais Alheraki | Firoj Alam | Preslav Nakov | Norah A. Alzahrani | Eman Albilali | Nizar Habash | Abdelrahman Mustafa El-Sheikh | Muhammad Elmallah | Hamdy Mubarak | Zaid Alyafeai | Mohamed Anwar | Haonan Li | Ahmed Abdelali | Nora Altwairesh | Maram Hasanain | Abdulmohsen Al-Thubaity | Shady Shehata | Bashar Alhafni | Injy Hamed | Go Inoue | Khalid N. Elmadani | Ossama Obeid | Fatima Haouari | Tamer Elsayed | Emad A. Alghamdi | Khalid Almubarak | Saied Alshahrani | Ola Aljareh | Safa Alajlan | Areej Alshaqarawi | Maryam Alshihri | Sultana Alghurabi | Atikah Alzeghayer | Afrah Altamimi | Abdullah Alfaifi | Abdulrahman M Alosaimy
Proceedings of The Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference

The impressive advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) in English has not been matched across all languages. In particular, LLM performance in Arabic lags behind, due to data scarcity, linguistic diversity of Arabic and its dialects, morphological complexity, etc. Progress is further hindered by the quality of Arabic benchmarks, which typically rely on static, publicly available data, lack comprehensive task coverage, or do not provide dedicated platforms with blind test sets. This makes it challenging to measure actual progress and to mitigate data contamination. Here, we aim to bridge these gaps. In particular, we introduce BALSAM, a comprehensive, community-driven benchmark aimed at advancing Arabic LLM development and evaluation. It includes 78 NLP tasks from 14 broad categories, with 52K examples divided into 37K test and 15K development, and a centralized, transparent platform for blind evaluation. We envision BALSAM as a unifying platform that sets standards and promotes collaborative research to advance Arabic LLM capabilities.

2023

pdf bib
KSAA-RD Shared Task: Arabic Reverse Dictionary
Rawan Al-Matham | Waad Alshammari | Abdulrahman AlOsaimy | Sarah Alhumoud | Asma Wazrah | Afrah Altamimi | Halah Alharbi | Abdullah Alaifi
Proceedings of ArabicNLP 2023

This paper outlines the KSAA-RD shared task, which aims to develop a Reverse Dictionary (RD) system for the Arabic language. RDs allow users to find words based on their meanings or definition. This shared task, KSAA-RD, includes two subtasks: Arabic RD and cross-lingual reverse dictionaries (CLRD). Given a definition (referred to as a “gloss”) in either Arabic or English, the teams compete to find the most similar word embeddings of their corresponding word. The winning team achieved 24.20 and 12.70 for RD and CLRD, respectively in terms of rank metric. In this paper, we describe the methods employed by the participating teams and offer an outlook for KSAA-RD.