@inproceedings{melnychuk-2025-comparing,
    title = "Comparing Methods for Multi-Label Classification of Manipulation Techniques in {U}krainian Telegram Content",
    author = "Melnychuk, Oleh",
    editor = "Romanyshyn, Mariana",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth Ukrainian Natural Language Processing Workshop (UNLP 2025)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Vienna, Austria (online)",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.unlp-1.5/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2025.unlp-1.5",
    pages = "45--48",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-269-5",
    abstract = "Detecting manipulation techniques in online text is vital for combating misinformation, a task complicated by generative AI. This paper compares machine learning approaches for multi-label classification of 10 techniques in Ukrainian Telegram content (UNLP 2025 Shared Task 1). Our evaluation included TF-IDF, fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa-Large, PEFT-LLM (Gemma, Mistral) and a RAG approach (E5 + Mistral Nemo). The fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa-Large model, which incorporates weighted loss to address class imbalance, yielded the highest Macro F1 score (0.4346). This result surpassed the performance of TF-IDF (Macro F1 0.32-0.36), the PEFT-LLM (0.28-0.33) and RAG (0.309). Synthetic data slightly helped TF-IDF but reduced transformer model performance. The results demonstrate the strong performance of standard transformers like XLM-R when appropriately configured for this classification task."
}