@inproceedings{colonel-lin-2025-word,
    title = "Word Clouds as Common Voices: {LLM}-Assisted Visualization of Participant-Weighted Themes in Qualitative Interviews",
    author = "Colonel, Joseph T  and
      Lin, Baihan",
    editor = "Blodgett, Su Lin  and
      Curry, Amanda Cercas  and
      Dev, Sunipa  and
      Li, Siyan  and
      Madaio, Michael  and
      Wang, Jack  and
      Wu, Sherry Tongshuang  and
      Xiao, Ziang  and
      Yang, Diyi",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Bridging Human-Computer Interaction and Natural Language Processing (HCI+NLP)",
    month = nov,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Suzhou, China",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.hcinlp-1.14/",
    pages = "169--177",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-353-1",
    abstract = "Word clouds are a common way to summarize qualitative interviews, yet traditional frequency-based methods often fail in conversational contexts: they surface filler words, ignore paraphrase, and fragment semantically related ideas. This limits their usefulness in early-stage analysis, when researchers need fast, interpretable overviews of what participant actually said. We introduce ThemeClouds, an open-source visualization tool that uses large language models (LLMs) to generate thematic, participant-weighted word clouds from dialogue transcripts. The system prompts an LLM to identify concept-level themes across a corpus and then counts how many unique participants mention each topic, yielding a visualization grounded in breadth of mention rather than raw term frequency. Researchers can customize prompts and visualization parameters, providing transparency and control. Using interviews from a user study comparing five recording-device configurations (31 participants; 155 transcripts, Whisper ASR), our approach surfaces more actionable device concerns than frequency clouds and topic-modeling baselines (e.g., LDA, BERTopic). We discuss design trade-offs for integrating LLM assistance into qualitative workflows, implications for interpretability and researcher agency, and opportunities for interactive analyses such as per-condition contrasts ({``}diff clouds'')."
}