SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants?

Yao Dou, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, Chris Kedzie, Weixin Cai, Alan Ritter, Chris Quirk, Wei Xu, Jianfeng Gao


Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in interactive applications, and human evaluation remains the gold standard for assessing their performance in multi-turn conversations. Since human studies are costly, time-consuming, and hard to reproduce, recent work explores using LLMs to simulate users for automatic assistant evaluation. However, there is no benchmark or systematic study to evaluate whether these simulated users are reliable stand-ins for real users. To address this, we introduce SimulatorArena, a benchmark of 909 annotated human–LLM conversations on two interactive tasks—math tutoring and document creation. SimulatorArena evaluates simulators based on how closely their messages match human behavior and how well their assistant ratings align with human judgments. Experiments on various simulator methods show that simulators conditioned on user profiles, capturing traits like background and message styles, align closely with human judgments. They reach Spearman’s 𝜌 of 0.7 on both tasks, providing a practical, scalable alternative to human evaluation. Using the best simulator for each task, we benchmark 18 assistants, including the latest LLMs such as GPT-5, Claude 4.1 Opus, and Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Anthology ID:
2025.emnlp-main.1786
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
November
Year:
2025
Address:
Suzhou, China
Editors:
Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, Violet Peng
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
35200–35278
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.emnlp-main.1786/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Yao Dou, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, Chris Kedzie, Weixin Cai, Alan Ritter, Chris Quirk, Wei Xu, and Jianfeng Gao. 2025. SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants?. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 35200–35278, Suzhou, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants? (Dou et al., EMNLP 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.emnlp-main.1786.pdf
Checklist:
 2025.emnlp-main.1786.checklist.pdf