Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions

Oghenevovwe Ikumariegbe, Eduardo Blanco, Ellen Riloff


Abstract
Distinguishing between rhetorical questions and informational questions is a challenging task, as many rhetorical questions have similar surface forms to informational questions. Existing datasets, however, do not contain many questions that can be rhetorical or informational in different contexts. We introduce Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions (SRAQ), a new dataset explicitly constructed to support the study of such rhetorical ambiguity. The questions in SRAQ can be interpreted as either rhetorical or informational depending on the context. We evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art language models on this dataset and find that they struggle to recognize many rhetorical questions.
Anthology ID:
2025.emnlp-main.1553
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
November
Year:
2025
Address:
Suzhou, China
Editors:
Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, Violet Peng
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
30507–30517
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.emnlp-main.1553/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Oghenevovwe Ikumariegbe, Eduardo Blanco, and Ellen Riloff. 2025. Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 30507–30517, Suzhou, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions (Ikumariegbe et al., EMNLP 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.emnlp-main.1553.pdf
Checklist:
 2025.emnlp-main.1553.checklist.pdf