@inproceedings{bashendy-etal-2025-taqeem,
    title = "{TAQEEM} 2025: Overview of The First Shared Task for {A}rabic Quality Evaluation of Essays in Multi-dimensions",
    author = "Bashendy, May  and
      Albatarni, Salam  and
      Eltanbouly, Sohaila  and
      Massoud, Walid  and
      Bouamor, Houda  and
      Elsayed, Tamer",
    editor = "Darwish, Kareem  and
      Ali, Ahmed  and
      Abu Farha, Ibrahim  and
      Touileb, Samia  and
      Zitouni, Imed  and
      Abdelali, Ahmed  and
      Al-Ghamdi, Sharefah  and
      Alkhereyf, Sakhar  and
      Zaghouani, Wajdi  and
      Khalifa, Salam  and
      AlKhamissi, Badr  and
      Almatham, Rawan  and
      Hamed, Injy  and
      Alyafeai, Zaid  and
      Alowisheq, Areeb  and
      Inoue, Go  and
      Mrini, Khalil  and
      Alshammari, Waad",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of The Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference: Shared Tasks",
    month = nov,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Suzhou, China",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2025.arabicnlp-sharedtasks.134/",
    pages = "966--976",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-356-2",
    abstract = "Automated Essay Scoring (AES) has emerged as a significant research problem in natural language processing, offering valuable tools to support educators in assessing student writing. Motivated by the growing need for reliable Arabic AES systems, we organized the first shared Task for Arabic Quality Evaluation of Essays in Multi-dimensions (TAQEEM) held at the ArabicNLP 2025 conference. TAQEEM 2025 includes two subtasks: Task A on holistic scoring and Task B on trait-specific scoring. It introduces a new (and first of its kind) dataset of 1,265 Arabic essays, annotated with holistic and trait-specific scores, including relevance, organization, vocabulary, style, development, mechanics, and grammar. The main goal of TAQEEM is to address the scarcity of standardized benchmarks and high-quality resources in Arabic AES. TAQEEM 2025 attracted 11 registered teams for Task A and 10 for Task B, with a total of 5 teams, across both tasks, submitting system runs for evaluation. This paper presents an overview of the task, outlines the approaches employed, and discusses the results of the participating teams."
}