@article{lee-etal-2022-erratum,
    title = "Erratum: Annotation Curricula to Implicitly Train Non-Expert Annotators",
    author = "Lee, Ji-Ung  and
      Klie, Jan-Christoph  and
      Gurevych, Iryna",
    journal = "Computational Linguistics",
    volume = "48",
    number = "4",
    month = dec,
    year = "2022",
    address = "Cambridge, MA",
    publisher = "MIT Press",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-emnlp/2022.cl-4.23/",
    doi = "10.1162/coli_x_00469",
    pages = "1141--1141",
    abstract = "The authors of this work ({``}Annotation Curricula to Implicitly Train Non-Expert Annotators'' by Ji-Ung Lee, Jan-Christoph Klie, and Iryna Gurevych in Computational Linguistics 48:2 \url{https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00436}) discovered an incorrect inequality symbol in section 5.3 (page 360). The paper stated that the differences in the annotation times for the control instances result in a p-value of 0.200 which is smaller than 0.05 (p = 0.200 {\ensuremath{<}} 0.05). As 0.200 is of course larger than 0.05, the correct inequality symbol is p = 0.200 {\ensuremath{>}} 0.05, which is in line with the conclusion that follows in the text. The paper has been updated accordingly."
}