@inproceedings{chen-etal-2026-conformal,
    title = "Conformal Feedback Alignment: Quantifying Answer-Level Reliability for Robust {LLM} Alignment",
    author = "Chen, Tiejin  and
      Liu, Xiaoou  and
      Nandam, Vishnu  and
      Liou, Kuan-Ru  and
      Wei, Hua",
    editor = "Demberg, Vera  and
      Inui, Kentaro  and
      Marquez, Llu{\'i}s",
    booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {EACL} 2026",
    month = mar,
    year = "2026",
    address = "Rabat, Morocco",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-eacl/2026.findings-eacl.184/",
    pages = "3561--3572",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-386-9",
    abstract = "Preference-based alignment like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) learns from pairwise preferences, yet the labels are often noisy and inconsistent. Existing uncertainty-aware approaches weight preferences, but ignore a more fundamental factor: the reliability of the answers being compared. To address the problem, we propose Conformal Feedback Alignment (CFA), a framework that grounds preference weighting in the statistical guarantees of Conformal Prediction (CP). CFA quantifies answer-level reliability by constructing conformal prediction sets with controllable coverage and aggregates these reliabilities into principled weights for both DPO- and PPO-style training. Experiments across different datasets show that CFA improves alignment robustness and data efficiency, highlighting that modeling answer-side uncertainty complements preference-level weighting and yields more robust, data-efficient alignment."
}