@article{shaar-etal-2025-triggers,
    title = "Are Triggers Needed for Document-Level Event Extraction?",
    author = "Shaar, Shaden  and
      Chen, Wayne  and
      Chatterjee, Maitreyi  and
      Wang, Barry  and
      Zhao, Wenting  and
      Cardie, Claire",
    journal = "Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
    volume = "13",
    year = "2025",
    address = "Cambridge, MA",
    publisher = "MIT Press",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-eacl/2025.tacl-1.71/",
    doi = "10.1162/tacl.a.51",
    pages = "1560--1577",
    abstract = "Most existing work on event extraction has focused on sentence-level texts and presumes the identification of a trigger-span{---}a word or phrase in the input that evokes the occurrence of an event of interest. Event arguments are then extracted with respect to the trigger. Indeed, triggers are treated as integral to, and trigger detection as an essential component of, event extraction. In this paper, we provide the first investigation of the role of triggers for the more difficult and much less studied task of document-level event extraction. We analyze their usefulness in multiple end-to-end and pipelined transformer-based event extraction models for three document-level event extraction datasets, measuring performance using triggers of varying quality (human-annotated, LLM-generated, keyword-based, and random). We find that whether or not systems benefit from explicitly extracting triggers depends both on dataset characteristics (i.e., the typical number of events per document) and task-specific information available during extraction (i.e., natural language event schemas). Perhaps surprisingly, we also observe that the mere existence of triggers in the input, even random ones, is important for prompt-based in-context learning approaches to the task."
}