High-stakes domains such as finance, law, and biomedicine demand both accurate results and rigorous reasoning. Current reinforcement learning paradigms primarily rely on outcome-based rewards, often overlooking latent logical fallacies in intermediate steps. Leveraging the cognitive asymmetry where falsifying local errors is more efficient than generating global correctness, we propose RADO (Reasoning Audit-Driven Optimization). RADO introduces a specialized audit model augmented with external tools to identify local logical ruptures and calibrate reward signals. By integrating Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), our framework enables explicit supervision over reasoning paths. Experimental results demonstrate that RADO consistently improves final accuracy while significantly enhancing logical rigor in high-stakes domains.

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from order bias, where their performance is affected by the arrangement order of input elements. This unfairness limits the model’s applications in scenarios such as in-context learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Recent studies attempt to obtain optimal or suboptimal arrangements based on statistical results or using dataset-based search, but these methods increase inference overhead while leaving the model’s inherent order bias unresolved. Other studies mitigate order sensitivity through supervised fine-tuning using augmented training sets with multiple order variants, but often at the cost of accuracy, trapping the model in consistent yet incorrect hallucinations. In this paper, we propose Dual Group Advantage Optimization (DGAO), which aims to improve model accuracy and order stability simultaneously. DGAO calculates and balances intra-group relative accuracy advantage and inter-group relative stability advantage, rewarding the policy model for generating order-stable and correct outputs while penalizing order-sensitive or incorrect responses. This marks the first time reinforcement learning has been used to mitigate LLMs’ order sensitivity. We also propose two new metrics, Consistency Rate and Overconfidence Rate, to reveal the pseudo-stability of previous methods and guide more comprehensive evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DGAO achieves superior order fairness while improving performance on RAG, mathematical reasoning, and classification tasks. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DGAO-A481/