Ziming Wang
Papers on this page may belong to the following people: Ziming Wang, Ziming Wang
2025
See the World, Discover Knowledge: A Chinese Factuality Evaluation for Large Vision Language Models
Jihao Gu | Yingyao Wang | Pi Bu | Chen Wang | Ziming Wang | Tengtao Song | Donglai Wei | Jiale Yuan | Yingxiu Zhao | Yancheng He | Shilong Li | Jiaheng Liu | Meng Cao | Jun Song | Yingshui Tan | Xiang Li | Wenbo Su | Xiaoyong Zhu | Bo Zheng
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025
Jihao Gu | Yingyao Wang | Pi Bu | Chen Wang | Ziming Wang | Tengtao Song | Donglai Wei | Jiale Yuan | Yingxiu Zhao | Yancheng He | Shilong Li | Jiaheng Liu | Meng Cao | Jun Song | Yingshui Tan | Xiang Li | Wenbo Su | Xiaoyong Zhu | Bo Zheng
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025
The evaluation of factual accuracy in large vision language models (LVLMs) has lagged behind their rapid development, making it challenging to fully reflect these models’ knowledge capacity and reliability. In this paper, we introduce the first factuality-based visual question-answering benchmark in Chinese, named ChineseSimpleVQA, aimed at assessing the visual factuality of LVLMs across 8 major topics and 56 subtopics. The key features of this benchmark include a focus on the Chinese language, diverse knowledge types, a multi-hop question construction, high-quality data, static consistency, and easy-to-evaluate through short answers. Moreover, we contribute a rigorous data construction pipeline and decouple the visual factuality into two parts: seeing the world (i.e., object recognition) and discovering knowledge. This decoupling allows us to analyze the capability boundaries and execution mechanisms of LVLMs. Subsequently, we evaluate 34 advanced open-source and closed-source models, revealing critical performance gaps within this field.
Towards Objective Fine-tuning: How LLMs’ Prior Knowledge Causes Potential Poor Calibration?
Ziming Wang | Zeyu Shi | Haoyi Zhou | Shiqi Gao | Qingyun Sun | Jianxin Li
Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Ziming Wang | Zeyu Shi | Haoyi Zhou | Shiqi Gao | Qingyun Sun | Jianxin Li
Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) often demonstrate poor calibration, with their confidence scores misaligned with actual performance. While calibration has been extensively studied in models trained from scratch, the impact of LLMs’ prior knowledge on calibration during fine-tuning remains understudied. Our research reveals that LLMs’ prior knowledge causes potential poor calibration due to the ubiquitous presence of known data in real-world fine-tuning, which appears harmful for calibration. Specifically, data aligned with LLMs’ prior knowledge would induce overconfidence, while new knowledge improves calibration. Our findings expose a tension: LLMs’ encyclopedic knowledge, while enabling task versatility, undermines calibration through unavoidable knowledge overlaps. To address this, we propose CogCalib, a cognition-aware framework that applies targeted learning strategies according to the model’s prior knowledge. Experiments across 7 tasks using 3 LLM families prove that CogCalib significantly improves calibration while maintaining performance, achieving an average 57% reduction in ECE compared to standard fine-tuning in Llama3-8B. These improvements generalize well to out-of-domain tasks, enhancing the objectivity and reliability of domain-specific LLMs, and making them more trustworthy for critical human-AI interaction applications.