Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a key paradigm for reducing factual hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet little is known about how the order of retrieved documents affects model behavior. We empirically show that under a Top-5 retrieval setting with the gold document included, LLM answers vary substantially across permutations of the retrieved set, even when the gold document is fixed in the first position. This reveals a previously underexplored sensitivity to retrieval permutations. Although existing robust RAG methods focus primarily on enhancing LLM robustness to low-quality retrieval and mitigating positional bias to distribute attention fairly over long contexts, neither approach directly addresses permutation sensitivity. In this paper, we propose Stable-RAG, which exploits permutation sensitivity estimation to mitigate permutation-induced hallucinations. Stable-RAG runs the generator under multiple retrieval orders, clusters hidden states, and decodes from a cluster-center representation that captures the dominant reasoning pattern. It then uses these reasoning results to align hallucinated outputs toward the correct answer, encouraging the model to produce consistent and accurate predictions across document permutations. Experiments on three QA datasets show that Stable-RAG improves answer accuracy, reasoning consistency, and generalization across datasets, retrievers, and input lengths compared with strong baselines.

The whole-page reranking integrates retrieval results from multiple modalities and is critical for user experience of search engines, yet it requires costly large-scale expert annotations due to the complexity of assessing cross-modal relevances. In this paper, we propose SMAR, a novel whole-page reranking framework that converts single-modal rankers into page-level guidance by constructing budget-aware candidates for cross modal annotations and distilling intra-modality preferences to align relevance scales across modalities. Specifically, we use pre-trained single-modal rankers to construct candidate pages for limited cross-modal annotation at the page level. The whole-page reranker is then trained on these samples, enforcing consistency with single-modal preferences to preserve intra-modal ranking quality. Experiments on the Qilin and CrossRank datasets demonstrate that SMAR reduces annotation costs by 70-90% while outperforming the fully-annotated reranking baselines. Further offline and online A/B tests confirm significant gains in both ranking metrics and user experience, validating the effectiveness and practical value of our approach in real-world search scenarios.

In competitive programming task, problem statements are often embedded within elaborate narrative backgrounds, requiring deep understanding of the underlying solutions to successfully complete the tasks. Current code generation models primarily focus on token-level semantic modeling, highly susceptible to distractions from irrelevant narrative statements. Inspired by RAG, retrieving reference code with similar solutions may help enhance model performance on difficult problems. However, existing retrieval models also emphasize surface-level semantic similarity, neglecting the deeper solution-level logical similarities that are critical in competitive programming. Therefore, designing ranking models capable of accurately identifying and retrieving problems and corresponding codes remains an urgent research problem in competitive code generation. In this paper, we propose SolveRank, a solution-aware ranking model empowered by synthetic data for competitive programming tasks. Specifically, we leverage the DeepSeek-R1 model to generate logically equivalent but differently phrased new problems, verified by GPT-4o for solution consistency. Then, we train SolveRank with these as positive samples and BM25/random-retrieved problems as negatives. During inference, SolveRank retrieves relevant problems and corresponding code from the corpus to assist a downstream code generator. Experiments on the xCodeEval dataset demonstrate that SolveRank outperforms SOTA ranking methods in precision and recall metrics, and boosts code generation performance for difficult problems.

Stealthy data poisoning during fine-tuning can backdoor large language models (LLMs), threatening downstream safety. Existing detectors either use classifier-style probability signals—ill-suited to generation—or rely on rewriting, which can degrade quality and even introduce new triggers. We address the practical need to efficiently remove poisoned examples before or during fine-tuning. We observe a robust signal in the response space: after applying TF-IDF to model responses, poisoned examples form compact clusters (driven by consistent malicious outputs), while clean examples remain dispersed. We leverage this with RFTC—Reference-Filtration + TF-IDF Clustering. RFTC first compares each example’s response with that of a reference model and flags those with large deviations as suspicious; it then performs TF-IDF clustering on the suspicious set and identifies true poisoned examples using intra-class distance. On two machine translation datasets and one QA dataset, RFTC outperforms prior detectors in both detection accuracy and the downstream performance of the fine-tuned models. Ablations with different reference models further validate the effectiveness and robustness of Reference-Filtration.