Enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to effectively utilize tools in multi-turn interactions is essential for building capable autonomous agents. However, acquiring diverse and realistic multi-turn tool-use data remains a significant challenge. In this work, we propose a novel text-based paradigm. We observe that textual corpora naturally contain rich, multi-step problem-solving experiences, which can serve as an untapped, scalable, and authentic data source for multi-turn tool-use tasks. Based on this insight, we introduce GEM, a data synthesis pipeline that enables the generation and extraction of multi-turn tool-use trajectories from text corpora through a four-stage process: relevance filtering, workflow tool extraction, trajectory grounding, and complexity refinement. To reduce the computational cost, we further train a specialized Trajectory Synthesizer via supervised fine-tuning. This model distills the complex generation pipeline into an efficient, end-to-end trajectory generator. Experiments demonstrate that our GEM-32B achieve a 14.9% improvement on the BFCL V3 Multi-turn benchmark. Our models partially surpass the performance of models trained on -bench (Airline and Retail) in-domain data, highlighting the superior generalization capability derived from our text-based synthesis paradigm. Notably, our Trajectory Synthesizer matches the quality of the full pipeline while significantly reducing inference latency and costs.

Recent advancements in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have showcased strong performance across various reasoning tasks by leveraging System-2 thinking capabilities. However, existing studies indicate that this reasoning ability alone does not reliably transfer to the general alignment domain. Inspired by cognitive science and how humans solve tasks, we argue that LRMs must be equipped with metacognitive knowledge to fully utilize their System-2 capabilities. In this paper, we propose Priority-Aware Metacognition (PAM), which guides the model to first identify the top-level human preference (e.g., harmlessness) as a means of understanding the alignment task’s nature, and then apply other kinds of metacognitive knowledge to better monitor and regulate the model’s thinking process. We implement PAM via a two-stage pipeline: a cold-start phase that collects structured metacognitive knowledge based on Flavell’s theoretical framework, and a preference-optimization phase that further reinforces such metacognition. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of PAM. Under the same training pipelines, PAM consistently yields higher performance, improving general domain alignment performance by ~10 points on the helpfulness and harmless benchmarks. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PAM-RM-02DF.

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human values has attracted increasing attention since it provides clarity, transparency, and the ability to adapt to evolving scenarios. In this paper, we introduce a Controlled Value Vector Activation (ConVA) method that directly aligns the internal values of LLMs by interpreting how a value is encoded in their latent representations and modifies relevant activations to ensure consistent values in LLMs. To ensure an accurate and unbiased interpretation, we propose a context-controlled value vector identification method. To consistently control values without sacrificing model performance, we introduce a gated value vector activation method for effective and minimum degree of value control. Experiments show that our method achieves the highest control success rate across 10 basic values without hurting LLM performance and fluency, and ensures target values even with opposite and potentially malicious input prompts. Source code and data are available at https://github.com/hr-jin/ConVA.

With the growing popularity of general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs), comes a need for more global explanations of model behaviors. Concept-based explanations arise as a promising avenue for explaining high-level patterns learned by LLMs. Yet their evaluation poses unique challenges, especially due to their non-local nature and high dimensional representation in a model’s hidden space. Current methods approach concepts from different perspectives, lacking a unified formalization. This makes evaluating the core measures of concepts, namely faithfulness or readability, challenging. To bridge the gap, we introduce a formal definition of concepts generalizing to diverse concept-based explanations’ settings. Based on this, we quantify the faithfulness of a concept explanation via perturbation. We ensure adequate perturbation in the high-dimensional space for different concepts via an optimization problem. Readability is approximated via an automatic and deterministic measure, quantifying the coherence of patterns that maximally activate a concept while aligning with human understanding. Finally, based on measurement theory, we apply a meta-evaluation method for evaluating these measures, generalizable to other types of explanations or tasks as well. Extensive experimental analysis has been conducted to inform the selection of explanation evaluation measures.