Large language models (LLMs) in retrieval-augmented generation systems can still produce hallucinations, generating content that is unsupported or contradicted by the source texts and undermines reliability. Recent work addressed this problem by training span-level hallucination detectors using reinforcement learning (RL) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. In this work, we show through error analysis that incorrect predictions by existing reasoning-based detectors are strongly associated with CoT processes that lack explicit grounding in source evidence, particularly when verification steps do not quote or verify claims against the retrieved documents. This behaviour contrasts with human verification practices in benchmarks such as RAGTruth, where evidence quotation is a prerequisite for determining hallucinated spans. Motivated by this observation, we propose an evidence-grounded RL framework, namely RLSeek, to explicitly enforce active evidence seeking during CoT reasoning by requiring quotation of relevant source segments at each verification step. Experiments on the RAGTruth and NewsSum dataset demonstrate consistent improvements in hallucination span detection performance, with limited additional reasoning overhead and improved robustness in out-of-domain settings.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) effectively enhances the accuracy and timeliness of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge retrieved from external sources. However, with the increasing prevalence of LLM-generated content, external corpora used by RAG systems may become contaminated with LLM-generated texts. Such contamination compromises the reliability and quality of retrieved results, ultimately leading to a degradation in RAG performance, and raises concerns about the diminishing presence of human texts and the “Spiral of Silence” effect. A natural solution is to incorporate LLM text detectors into the RAG pipeline to filter out LLM-generated texts from the retrieved results. However, their effective use in RAG remains under-explored. In this paper, we explore the usage paradigms of LLM text detectors for RAG and highlight key limitations of off-the-shelf or directly fine-tuned detectors. To this end, we propose a RAG-aware data augmentation strategy that aligns detector training with realistic contamination patterns. Our approach synthesizes training data from both LLM and human texts under diverse generation modes. Experiments show that our method mitigates performance degradation and improves the long-term stability of RAG systems.

Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent text, raising concerns about misuse in online comments and academic writing, leading to issues like corpus pollution and copyright infringement. Existing LLM text detection methods often rely on features from the logit distribution of the input text. However, the distinction between the LLM-generated and human-written texts may rely on only a few tokens due to the short length or insufficient information in some texts, leading to minimal and hard-to-detect differences in logit distributions. To address this, we propose HALO, an LLM-based detection method that leverages external text corpora to evaluate the difference in the logit distribution of input text under retrieved human-written and LLM-rewritten contexts. HALO also complements basic detection features and can serve as a plug-and-play module to enhance existing detection methods. Extensive experiments on five public datasets with three widely-used source LLMs show that our proposed detection method achieves state-of-the-art performance in AUROC, both in cross-domain and domain-specific scenarios.

Personalized chatbots focus on endowing the chatbots with a consistent personality to behave like real users and further act as personal assistants. Previous studies have explored generating implicit user profiles from the user’s dialogue history for building personalized chatbots. However, these studies only use the response generation loss to train the entire model, thus it is prone to suffer from the problem of data sparsity. Besides, they overemphasize the final generated response’s quality while ignoring the correlations and fusions between the user’s dialogue history, leading to rough data representations and performance degradation. To tackle these problems, we propose a self-supervised learning framework MCP for capturing better representations from users’ dialogue history for personalized chatbots. Specifically, we apply contrastive sampling methods to leverage the supervised signals hidden in user dialog history, and generate the pre-training samples for enhancing the model. We design three pre-training tasks based on three types of contrastive pairs from user dialogue history, namely response pairs, sequence augmentation pairs, and user pairs. We pre-train the utterance encoder and the history encoder towards the contrastive objectives and use these pre-trained encoders for generating user profiles while personalized response generation. Experimental results on two real-world datasets show a significant improvement in our proposed model MCP compared with the existing methods.