Large language model (LLM) agents have exhibited strong problem-solving competence across domains like research and coding. Yet, it remains underexplored whether LLM agents can tackle compounding real-world problems that require a diverse set of tools to complete. Given a broad, heterogeneous tool repository, LLM agents must not only select appropriate tools based on task planning analysis but also strategically schedule the execution order to ensure efficiency. This paper introduces TPS-Bench to benchmark the ability of LLM agents in solving such problems that demand Tool Planning and Scheduling. TPS-Bench collects 200 compounding tasks of two difficulty levels, based on a tool repository containing hundreds of model context protocol (MCP) tools. In particular, each task is composed of multiple subtasks, such as web search, map navigation, calendar checking, etc., and each subtask can be completed by a basic tool. Our evaluation emphasizes both task completion rate and efficiency. The empirical studies on popular closed-source and open-source LLMs indicate that most models can perform reasonable tool planning, but differ in scheduling. For example, GLM-4.5 achieves an outperforming task completion rate of 64.72% with extensive sequential tool calls, hence suffering from significantly long execution time. By contrast, GPT-4o prioritizes parallel tool calls but achieves only a 45.08% completion rate. Considering reinforcement learning (RL) can be a viable way to improve the scheduling efficiency without compromising performance, we perform an initial study on Qwen3-1.7B and witness a 14% reduction in execution time alongside a 6% gain in task completion rate based on only 597 RL training samples.

“专利文献是一种重要的技术文献,是知识产权强国的重要工作内容。目前专利语料库多集中于信息检索、机器翻译以及文本文分类等领域,尚缺乏更细粒度的标注,不足以支持问答、阅读理解等新形态的人工智能技术研发。本文面向专利智能分析的需要,提出了从解决问题、技术手段、效果三个角度对发明专利进行专利标注,并最终构建了包含313篇的中文专利关键信息语料库。利用命名实体识别技术对语料库关键信息进行识别和验证,表明专利关键信息的识别是不同于领域命名实体识别的更大粒度的信息抽取难题。”