Yihan Jiang
2026
FinSafetyBench: Evaluating LLM Safety in Real-World Financial Scenarios
Yutao Hou | Yihan Jiang | Yuhan Xie | Jian Yang | Liwen Zhang | Hailiang Huang | Guanhua Chen | Yun Chen
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Yutao Hou | Yihan Jiang | Yuhan Xie | Jian Yang | Liwen Zhang | Hailiang Huang | Guanhua Chen | Yun Chen
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in financial scenarios. However, they may produce harmful outputs, including facilitating illegal activities or unethical behavior, posing serious compliance risks. To systematically evaluate LLM safety in finance, we propose FinSafetyBench, a bilingual (English-Chinese) red-teaming benchmark designed to test an LLM’s refusal of requests that violate financial compliance. Grounded in real-world financial crime cases and ethics standards, the benchmark comprises 14 subcategories spanning financial crimes and ethical violations. Through extensive experiments on general-purpose and finance-specialized LLMs under three representative attack settings, we identify critical vulnerabilities that allow adversarial prompts to bypass compliance safeguards. Further analysis reveals stronger susceptibility in Chinese contexts and highlights the limitations of prompt-level defenses against sophisticated or implicit manipulation strategies.
Toward Automated Robustness Evaluation of Mathematical Reasoning
Yutao Hou | Zeguan Xiao | Fei Yu | Yihan Jiang | Ma Shuguang | Zhaoqian Dai | Hailiang Huang | Yun Chen | Guanhua Chen
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Yutao Hou | Zeguan Xiao | Fei Yu | Yihan Jiang | Ma Shuguang | Zhaoqian Dai | Hailiang Huang | Yun Chen | Guanhua Chen
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various reasoning-intensive tasks. However, these models exhibit unexpected brittleness, often failing on simple variations of the same underlying task. Existing robustness evaluations predominantly rely on hand-crafted templates or a limited set of perturbation rules. Consequently, such approaches lack the adaptability to probe latent vulnerabilities unique to specific models and remain susceptible to data contamination. To address this, we propose the Math Stress Tester (MaSTer), an automated framework inspired by software stress testing. MaSTer generates adversarial variants via a multi-round rewrite-verify loop, ensuring semantic consistency while successfully inducing model failure. Our framework generates benchmark variants dynamically for each LLM, thus minimizing the risk of data contamination. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH-500 demonstrate the effectiveness of MaSTer on mathematical tasks. Additionally, we validate the framework’s extensibility to non-mathematical tasks, highlighting its broad applicability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the synthesized variants generated by MaSTer can be utilized as a fine-tuning dataset to significantly enhance the model’s robustness.