Large language models (LLMs)-based multi-agent systems have recently shown strong potential for machine translation (MT). However, their application to multi-domain translation (MDT) remains under-explored, particularly in addressing cross-domain word ambiguity. To investigate whether multi-agent approaches can help disambiguation in MDT, we propose a multi-agent collaborative disambiguation framework for MDT (MACD), which leverages the collaborative capabilities of LLMs for disambiguation. MACD consists of four cooperating agents responsible for domain allocation, general translation, domain disambiguation, and translation fusion. Experimental results show that MACD significantly improves translation performance across multiple domains and enhances disambiguation accuracy. Our approach reveals several findings on multi-agent collaboration in resolving word ambiguities.

Existing psychological counseling datasets often suffer from monolithic client personas, insufficient therapeutic depth, and a lack of process controllability. To address these critical limitations, we propose PsyChain, a chain-of-agents framework that evolves static counseling corpora into high-fidelity dialogues through collaborative simulation which explicitly models client personality, stage progression, safety monitoring, and expert supervision. PsyChain involves a Client Profiler that extracts life scenarios and pairs them with psychological personality archetypes to synthesize diverse profiles.To simulate the complete counseling process, five specialized agents—Process Monitor, Client Speaker, Safety Monitor, Counselor Supervisor, and Counselor Speaker—collaborate and interact autonomously at each dialogue turn to ensure therapeutic professionalism and safety.We apply this to construct PsyChainD, a Chinese dataset of 10,456 dialogues featuring systematically diverse client profiles. Extensive evaluation across client side, counselor side and overall quality shows substantial improvements. The model trained on PsyChainD achieves 61-91% win rates against domain-specific baselines in pairwise evaluation and the highest average score in human evaluation, indicating potential for real-world counseling.

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has opened new possibilities for mental health support, yet current approaches lack realism in simulating specialized psychotherapy and fail to capture therapeutic progression over time. Narrative therapy, which helps individuals transform problematic life stories into empowering alternatives, remains underutilized due to limited access and social stigma. We address these limitations through a comprehensive framework with two core components. First, **INT** (Interactive Narrative Therapist) simulates expert narrative therapists by planning therapeutic stages, guiding reflection levels, and generating contextually appropriate responses through retrieval-augmentation. Second, **IMA** (Innovative Moment Assessment) provides a therapy-centric evaluation method that quantifies effectiveness by tracking “Innovative Moments” (IMs), critical narrative shifts in client speech signaling therapy progress. Experimental results on 260 simulated clients and 230 human participants reveal that **INT** consistently outperforms standard methods in therapeutic quality and depth. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of **INT** in synthesizing high-quality support conversations to facilitate social applications.

LLMs exhibit promising Social Intelligence (SI) in modeling human behavior, raising the need to evaluate LLMs’ SI and their discrepancy with humans. SI equips humans with interpersonal abilities to behave wisely in navigating social interactions to achieve social goals. This presents an operational evaluation paradigm: outcome-oriented goal achievement evaluation and process-oriented interpersonal ability evaluation, which existing work fails to address. To this end, we propose SocialEval, a script-based bilingual SI benchmark, integrating outcome- and process-oriented evaluation by manually crafting narrative scripts. Each script is structured as a world tree that contains plot lines driven by interpersonal ability, providing a comprehensive view of how LLMs navigate social interactions. Experiments show that LLMs fall behind humans on both SI evaluations, exhibit prosociality, and prefer more positive social behaviors, even if they lead to goal failure. Analysis of LLMs’ formed representation space and neuronal activations reveals that LLMs have developed ability-specific functional partitions akin to the human brain.

Keyphrase extraction aims to automatically extract salient phrases representing the critical information in the source document. Identifying salient phrases is challenging because there is a lot of noisy information in the document, leading to wrong extraction. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose a hybrid matching model for keyphrase extraction, which combines representation-focused and interaction-based matching modules into a unified framework for improving the performance of the keyphrase extraction task. Specifically, HybridMatch comprises (1) a PLM-based Siamese encoder component that represents both candidate phrases and documents, (2) an interaction-focused matching (IM) component that estimates word matches between candidate phrases and the corresponding document at the word level, and (3) a representation-focused matching (RM) component captures context-aware semantic relatedness of each candidate keyphrase at the phrase level. Extensive experimental results on the OpenKP dataset demonstrate that the performance of the proposed model HybridMatch outperforms the recent state-of-the-art keyphrase extraction baselines. Furthermore, we discuss the performance of large language models in keyphrase extraction based on recent studies and our experiments.